The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon Modifications and Surfaces for Catalytic Organic Transformations
Abstract
Carbon is anything but a new material, yet ubiquitously applicable for many catalytic transformations in modern organic chemistry. It is highly versatile, as it occurs as modifications abundantly available as 1–3D carbonaceous materials due to technical progress. In addition, materials such as activated charcoal, ordered mesoporous carbon (OMC), graphite and graphene (oxide), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), nanospheres (nano-onions, fullerenes), and many others are no “innocent” supports, as demonstrated by many recent publications within the revitalized field of “carbocatalysis”. By nature, carbon scaffolds offer a perfect link between nanoscaled matter and organic molecules, which makes them an ideal cornerstone for molecular catalysts. Apart from this inherent chemical significance, the physical properties (e.g., different conductivity) are equally important for the performance of heterogeneous or immobilized homogeneous catalysts. Careful selection of the carbon scaffold enables control of reactivity by tuning the electronic interactions of active sites with the support or among each other. Moreover, separation and recycling of “heterogenized” catalysts can be further improved by rendering carbon “magnetic”, that is, by incorporation of magnetic particles or by coating metal nanomagnets with graphene-like shells. Altogether, tuning the properties of carbon supports might lead to catalysts tailored not only in matters of reactivity (electron shuttle), but also to down-to-earth problems such as purification (magnetic separation and recycling). This critical review will highlight how far such concepts have already been implemented in the design of “heterogenized” catalysts and is meant to widen the perspectives where certain concepts have yet to be realized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The chemistry of graphene oxide
Dreyer, D. R., Park, S., Bielawski, C. W., & Ruoff, R. S. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b917103g · Cited by 11,653
Scheuermann, G. M., Rumi, L., Steurer, P., Bannwarth, W., & Mülhaupt, R. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja901105a · Cited by 1,163
Carbons as supports for industrial precious metal catalysts
Auer, E., Freund, A., Pietsch, J., & Tacke, T. (1998) · Applied Catalysis A: General · doi:10.1016/s0926-860x(98)00184-7 · Cited by 792
Shao, Y., Sui, J., Yin, G., & Gao, Y. (2008) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.09.047 · Cited by 763
Cited by
Visible Photocatalytic Activity Enhancement of ZnWO4 by Graphene Hybridization
Bai, X., Wang, L., & Zhu, Y. (2012) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs3005852 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaetz, A., Zeltner, M., & Stark, W. J.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-05-22
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1267-1284
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2318809197
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.