The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Active Sites in Sn-Beta for Glucose Isomerization to Fructose and Epimerization to Mannose
Abstract
Framework Lewis acidic tin sites in hydrophobic, pure-silica molecular sieves with the zeolite beta topology (Sn-Beta) have been reported previously to predominantly catalyze glucose−fructose isomerization via 1,2 intramolecular hydride shift in water and glucose–mannose epimerization via 1,2 intramolecular carbon shift in methanol. Here, we show that alkali-free Sn-Beta predominantly isomerizes glucose to fructose via 1,2 intramolecular hydride shift in both water and methanol. Increasing extents of postsynthetic Na + exchange onto Sn-Beta, however, progressively shifts the reaction pathway toward glucose–mannose epimerization via 1,2 intramolecular carbon shift. Na + remains exchanged onto silanol groups proximal to Sn centers during reaction in methanol solvent, leading to nearly exclusive selectivity toward epimerization. In contrast, decationation occurs with increasing reaction time in aqueous solvent and gradually shifts the reaction selectivity to isomerization at the expense of epimerization. Decationation and the concomitant selectivity changes are mitigated by the addition of NaCl to the aqueous reaction solution. Preadsorption of ammonia onto Sn-Beta leads to near complete suppression of infrared and 119 Sn nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic signatures attributed to open Sn sites and of glucose−fructose isomerization pathways in water and methanol. These data provide evidence that Lewis acidic open Sn sites with either proximal silanol groups or Na-exchanged silanol groups are respectively the active sites for glucose–fructose isomerization and glucose–mannose epimerization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zheng, A., Liu, S.-B., & Deng, F. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00289 · Cited by 365
From 3D to 2D zeolite catalytic materials
Přech, J., Pizarro, P., Serrano, D. P., & Čejka, J. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00370j · Cited by 313
Catalytic Isomerization of Biomass‐Derived Aldoses: A Review
Delidovich, I., & Palkovits, R. (2016) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201501577 · Cited by 300
Iglesias, J., Martínez-Salazar, I., Maireles-Torres, P., Martin Alonso, D., Mariscal, R., & López Granados, M. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00177e · Cited by 292
Efficient valorization of biomass to biofuels with bifunctional solid catalytic materials
Li, H., Fang, Z., Smith, R. L., & Yang, S. (2016) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2016.04.004 · Cited by 284
Chen, S. S., Maneerung, T., Tsang, D. C. W., Ok, Y. S., & Wang, C.-H. (2017) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.020 · Cited by 258
Selectivity control for cellulose to diols: dancing on eggs
Zheng, M., Pang, J., Sun, R., Wang, A., & Zhang, T. (2017) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b03469 · Cited by 210
Influence of solvent structure and hydrogen bonding on catalysis at solid–liquid interfaces
Potts, D. S., Bregante, D. T., Adams, J. S., Torres, C., & Flaherty, D. W. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00539a · Cited by 190
Defect‐Mediated Ordering of Condensed Water Structures in Microporous Zeolites
Bukowski, B. C., Bates, J. S., Gounder, R., & Greeley, J. (2019) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201908151 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bermejo-Deval, R., Orazov, M., Gounder, R., Hwang, S.-J., & Davis, M. E.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-06-13
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2288-2297
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112270990
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.