The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Highly Dispersed Copper Oxide Clusters as Active Species in Copper-Ceria Catalyst for Preferential Oxidation of Carbon Monoxide
Abstract
Copper-ceria is one of the very active catalysts for the preferential oxidation of carbon monoxide (CO-PROX) reaction, which is also a typical system in which the complexity of copper chemistry is clearly exhibited. In the present manuscript, copper–ceria catalysts with different Cu contents up to 20 wt % supported on CeO 2 nanorods were synthesized by a deposition–precipitation (DP) method. The as-prepared samples were characterized by various structural and textural detections including X-ray diffraction (XRD), Vis-Raman, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), ex situ / in situ X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS), and temperature-programmed reduction by hydrogen (H 2 -TPR). It has been confirmed that the highly dispersed copper oxide (CuO x ) clusters, as well as the strong interaction of Cu-[O x ]-Ce structure, were the main copper species deposited onto the ceria surface. No separated copper phase was detected for both preoxidized and prereduced samples with the Cu contents up to 10 wt %. The fresh copper–ceria catalysts were pretreated in either O 2 - or H 2 -atmosphere and then tested for the CO-PROX reaction at a space velocity (SV) of 60 000 mL·h –1 ·g cat –1 . The prereduced 5 and 10 wt % Cu samples exhibited excellent catalytic performance with high CO conversions (>50%, up to 100%) and O 2 selectivities (>60%, up to 100%) within a wide temperature window of 80–140 °C. The in situ XAFS technique was carried out to monitor the structural evolution on the copper–ceria catalysts during the PROX experiments. The X-ray absorption near edge spectra (XANES) profiles, by the aid of linear combination analysis, identified the oxidized Cu(II) were the dominant copper species in both O 2 - and H 2 -pretreated samples after CO-PROX at 80 °C. Furthermore, the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) fitting results, together with the corresponding H 2 -TPR data distinctly determined that the highly dispersed CuO x ( x = 0.2−0.5) cluster, other than the Cu–[O x ]–Ce ( x = 0.7−3.2) structure, were the crucial active species for the studied CO-PROX reaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fundamentals and Catalytic Applications of CeO 2 -Based Materials
Montini, T., Melchionna, M., Monai, M., & Fornasiero, P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00603 · Cited by 2,766
Wang, W.-W., Yu, W.-Z., Du, P.-P., Xu, H., Jin, Z., Si, R., Ma, C., Shi, S., Jia, C.-J., & Yan, C.-H. (2017) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b03234 · Cited by 444
Self-citationSun, H., Wang, H., & Qu, Z. (2023) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.2c05168 · Cited by 298
Li, H., Fang, W., Wang, L.-X., Liu, Y., Liu, L., Sun, T., Liao, C., Zhu, Y., Wang, L., & Xiao, F.-S. (2023) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100445 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, W.-W., Du, P.-P., Zou, S.-H., He, H.-Y., Wang, R.-X., Jin, Z., Shi, S., Huang, Y.-Y., Si, R., Song, Q.-S., Jia, C.-J., & Yan, C.-H.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-03-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2088-2099
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2328501680
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.