Cited by 155Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesMetalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins

Engineering the Composition and Crystallinity of Molybdenum Sulfide for High-Performance Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

Li, Yanpeng, Yu, Yifei, Huang, Yufeng, Nielsen, Robert A., Goddard, William A., Li, Yao, Cao, Linyou·2015·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

The key challenge for the development of high-performance molybdenum sulfide HER catalysts lies in the limited fundamental understanding for the correlation between the catalytic activities and physical features of the materials. Here we have demonstrated an unambiguous correlation between the catalytic performance and the composition/crystallinity of molybdenum sulfide. The results indicate that the crystallinity plays an overwhelming role in determining the catalytic performance, while the composition does not matter much. The crystallinity can affect the three figures of merit of the catalytic performance (Tafel slope, turnover frequency (TOF), and stability) in opposite directions. Generally, the materials with low crystalline quality may provide low Tafel slopes (∼40 mV/dec), while highly crystalline molybdenum sulfide shows higher TOFs (by 2 orders of magnitude) and better stability. DFT calculations suggest that the terminal disulfur complex S 2 2–, which may exist in MoS 3 and also likely MoS 2 of low crystalline quality due to its structural disorder, could be the true catalytically active site responsible for the low Tafel slope. Our results indicate that one key issue for the rational design of high-performance molybdenum sulfide HER catalysts is to engineer the crystallinity such that balancing its contradictory effects on the different aspects of the catalytic performance. We show that nanocrystalline MoS 2 with few-layer nanoclusters in a lateral size of 5–30 nm…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cs501635v

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Yu, Y., Huang, Y., Nielsen, R. A., Goddard, W. A., Li, Y., & Cao, L.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Yanpeng
  • Cao, Linyou
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2014-12-17
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
448-455
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983776877
Cited by
155
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 12
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Basic Energy Sciences (DE-SC0012575)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
Keywords
molybdenum sulfide, hydrogen evolution reaction, electrocatalysis, crystallinity, Tafel slope, turnover frequency, catalyst stability, amorphous MoS2, molybdenum trisulfide, composition effects, rational catalyst design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review