The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of the Weighted Histogram Analysis Method for the Analysis of Simulated and Parallel Tempering Simulations
Abstract
The growing adoption of generalized-ensemble algorithms for biomolecular simulation has resulted in a resurgence in the use of the weighted histogram analysis method (WHAM) to make use of all data generated by these simulations. Unfortunately, the original presentation of WHAM by Kumar et al. is not directly applicable to data generated by these methods. WHAM was originally formulated to combine data from independent samplings of the canonical ensemble, whereas many generalized-ensemble algorithms sample from mixtures of canonical ensembles at different temperatures. Sorting configurations generated from a parallel tempering simulation by temperature obscures the temporal correlation in the data and results in an improper treatment of the statistical uncertainties used in constructing the estimate of the density of states. Here we present variants of WHAM, STWHAM and PTWHAM, derived with the same set of assumptions, that can be directly applied to several generalized ensemble algorithms, including simulated tempering, parallel tempering (better known as replica-exchange among temperatures), and replica-exchange simulated tempering. We present methods that explicitly capture the considerable temporal correlation in sequentially generated configurations using autocorrelation analysis. This allows estimation of the statistical uncertainty in WHAM estimates of expectations for the canonical ensemble. We test the method with a one-dimensional model system and then apply it to the estimation of potentials of mean force from parallel tempering simulations of the alanine dipeptide in both implicit and explicit solvent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Cited by
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations
Klimovich, P. V., Shirts, M. R., & Mobley, D. L. (2015) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-015-9840-9 · Cited by 490
Mobley, D. L., Chodera, J. D., & Dill, K. A. (2006) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2221683 · Cited by 316
Self-citationRocklin, G. J., Mobley, D. L., Dill, K. A., & Hünenberger, P. H. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4826261 · Cited by 234
Self-citationPredictions of Ligand Selectivity from Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations
Aldeghi, M., Heifetz, A., Bodkin, M. J., Knapp, S., & Biggin, P. C. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b11467 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Chodera, J. D., Swope, W. C., Pitera, J. W., Seok, C., & Dill, K. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-11-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-41
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2129213941
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of the Weighted Histogram Analysis Method for the Analysis of Simulated and Parallel Tempering Simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ct0502864
- The paper
- Chodera, J. D., Swope, W. C., Pitera, J. W., Seok, C., & Dill, K. A. (2007). Use of the Weighted Histogram Analysis Method for the Analysis of Simulated and Parallel Tempering Simulations. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct0502864
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.