The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perspectives on Basis Sets Beautiful: Seasonal Plantings of Diffuse Basis Functions
Open accessAbstract
We present a perspective on the use of diffuse basis functions for electronic structure calculations by density functional theory and wave function theory. We especially emphasize minimally augmented basis sets and calendar basis sets. We base our conclusions on our previous experience with commonly computed quantities, such as bond energies, barrier heights, electron affinities, noncovalent (van der Waals and hydrogen bond) interaction energies, and ionization potentials, on Stephens et al.'s results for optical rotation and on our own new calculations (presented here) of polarizabilities and of potential energy curves of van der Waals complexes. We emphasize the benefits of partial augmentation of the higher-zeta basis sets in preference to full augmentation at a lower ζ level. Benefits and limitations of the use of fully, partially, and minimally augmented basis sets are reviewed for different electronic structure methods and molecular properties. We have found that minimal augmentation is almost always enough for density functional theory (DFT) when applied to ionization potentials, electron affinities, atomization energies, barrier heights, and hydrogen-bond energies. For electric dipole polarizabilities, we find that augmentation beyond minimal has an average effect of 8% at the polarized triple-ζ level and 5% at the polarized quadruple-ζ level. The effects are larger for potential energy curves of van der Waals complexes. The effects are also larger for wave function theory (WFT). Even for WFT though, full augmentation is not needed for most purposes, and a level of augmentation between minimal and full is optimal for most problems. The calendar basis sets named after the months provide a convergent sequence of partially augmented basis sets that can be used for such calculations. The jun-cc-pV(T+d)Z basis set is very useful for MP2-F12 calculations of barrier heights and hydrogen bond strengths.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Minimally augmented Karlsruhe basis sets
Zheng, J., Xu, X., & Truhlar, D. G. (2011) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/s00214-010-0846-z · Cited by 1,067
Self-citation
Cited by
Improved Peptide and Protein Torsional Energetics with the OPLS-AA Force Field
Robertson, M. J., Tirado-Rives, J., & Jorgensen, W. L. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00356 · Cited by 854
Revised Damping Parameters for the D3 Dispersion Correction to Density Functional Theory
Smith, D. G. A., Burns, L. A., Patkowski, K., & Sherrill, C. D. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00780 · Cited by 532
Benchmark Calculations of Interaction Energies in Noncovalent Complexes and Their Applications
Řezáč, J., & Hobza, P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00526 · Cited by 455
Non-bonded force field model with advanced restrained electrostatic potential charges (RESP2)
Schauperl, M., Nerenberg, P. S., Jang, H., Wang, L.-P., Bayly, C. I., Mobley, D. L., & Gilson, M. K. (2020) · Communications Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s42004-020-0291-4 · Cited by 323
Concerted nucleophilic aromatic substitutions
Kwan, E. E., Zeng, Y., Besser, H. A., & Jacobsen, E. N. (2018) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41557-018-0079-7 · Cited by 287
Brauer, B., Kesharwani, M. K., Kozuch, S., & Martin, J. M. L. (2016) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c6cp00688d · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Papajak, E., Zheng, J., Xu, X., Leverentz, H. R., & Truhlar, D. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-08-31
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3027-3034
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2327394219
- Cited by
- 780
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.