The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Correlation Function Formalism for Triplet Excited State Decay: Combined Spin–Orbit and Nonadiabatic Couplings
Abstract
Based on the second-order perturbation combining spin-orbit and nonadiabatic couplings, we derived an analytical formula for nonradiative decay rate between the triplet and singlet states by using the thermal vibration correlation function (TVCF) approach. Origin displacement, distortion, and Duschinsky rotation of the potential energy surfaces are taken into accounts within the multiple harmonic oscillator model. When coupled with first-principles calculation for the anthracene, the theoretical phosphorescence spectrum is in good agreement with the experiment. Furthermore, we found that the intersystem crossing from the first excited singlet state (S1) to the triplet states S1(Bu)→T2(Ag) is forbidden by direct spin-orbit coupling at the first-order perturbation but becomes allowed through combined spin-orbit and the nonadiabatic couplings at the second-order perturbation, and the rate is calculated to be 0.26 × 10(8) s(-1), in good agreement with the experiment. Such formalism is also applied to describe the phosphorescence quantum efficiency and the temperature dependent optical emission spectrum for fac-tris(2-phenylpyridine) iridium. We predict that the radiative decay rate is 6.36 × 10(5) s(-1), the nonradiative decay rate is 5.04 × 10(4) s(-1), and the phosphorescence quantum efficiency is found to be 92.7% from T1 to S0, which reproduce well the corresponding experimental measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hong, Y., Lam, J. W. Y., & Tang, B. Z. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c1cs15113d · Cited by 6,363
Cited by
Theory and Calculation of the Phosphorescence Phenomenon
Baryshnikov, G., Minaev, B., & Ågren, H. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00060 · Cited by 731
Ma, H., Peng, Q., An, Z., Huang, W., & Shuai, Z. (2019) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b11224 · Cited by 613
Self-citationShuai, Z., & Peng, Q. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.12.002 · Cited by 477
Self-citationShuai, Z., & Peng, Q. (2017) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nww024 · Cited by 375
Self-citationWen, K., Tan, H., Peng, Q., Chen, H., Ma, H., Wang, L., Peng, A., Shi, Q., Cai, X., & Huang, H. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202108146 · Cited by 298
Self-citationWu, C., Corrigan, N., Lim, C.-H., Liu, W., Miyake, G., & Boyer, C. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00409 · Cited by 259
Quantum biology. π – π entanglement signatures in protein-DNA interactions
D’Acunto, M. (2022) · Physical Biology · doi:10.1088/1478-3975/ac5bda · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, Q., Niu, Y., Shi, Q., Gao, X., & Shuai, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-01-14
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1132-1143
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2332313114
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.