The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Balanced Protein–Water Interactions Improve Properties of Disordered Proteins and Non-Specific Protein Association
Open accessAbstract
Some frequently encountered deficiencies in all-atom molecular simulations, such as nonspecific protein-protein interactions being too strong, and unfolded or disordered states being too collapsed, suggest that proteins are insufficiently well solvated in simulations using current state-of-the-art force fields. To address these issues, we make the simplest possible change, by modifying the short-range protein-water pair interactions, and leaving all the water-water and protein-protein parameters unchanged. We find that a modest strengthening of protein-water interactions is sufficient to recover the correct dimensions of intrinsically disordered or unfolded proteins, as determined by direct comparison with small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) data. The modification also results in more realistic protein-protein affinities, and average solvation free energies of model compounds which are more consistent with experiment. Most importantly, we show that this scaling is small enough not to affect adversely the stability of the folded state, with only a modest effect on the stability of model peptides forming α-helix and β-sheet structures. The proposed adjustment opens the way to more accurate atomistic simulations of proteins, particularly for intrinsically disordered proteins, protein-protein association, and crowded cellular environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How fast-folding proteins fold
Lindorff-Larsen, K., Piana, S., Dror, R. O., & Shaw, D. E. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208351 · Cited by 1,980
Designing a 20-residue protein
Neidigh, J. W., Fesinmeyer, R. M., & Andersen, N. H. (2002) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb798 · Cited by 793
Schwantes, C. R., & Pande, V. S. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct300878a · Cited by 597
Temperature-dependent solvation modulates the dimensions of disordered proteins
Wuttke, R., Hofmann, H., Nettels, D., Borgia, M. B., Mittal, J., Best, R. B., & Schuler, B. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1313006111 · Cited by 192
Self-citationFolding kinetics and unfolded state dynamics of the GB1 hairpin from molecular simulation
De Sancho, D., Mittal, J., & Best, R. B. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct301033r · Cited by 35
Self-citation
Cited by
Piana, S., Donchev, A. G., Robustelli, P., & Shaw, D. E. (2015) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp508971m · Cited by 852
Molecular interactions underlying liquid‐liquid phase separation of the FUS low‐complexity domain
Murthy, A. C., Dignon, G. L., Kan, Y., Zerze, G. H., Parekh, S. H., Mittal, J., & Fawzi, N. L. (2019) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-019-0250-x · Cited by 698
Self-citationLarge-Scale Assessment of Binding Free Energy Calculations in Active Drug Discovery Projects
Schindler, C. E. M., Baumann, H., Blum, A., Böse, D., Buchstaller, H.-P., Burgdorf, L., Cappel, D., Chekler, E., Czodrowski, P., Dorsch, D., et al. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00900 · Cited by 303
Abyzov, A., Blackledge, M., & Zweckstetter, M. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00774 · Cited by 215
Finding Our Way in the Dark Proteome
Bhowmick, A., Brookes, D. H., Yost, S. R., Dyson, H. J., Forman-Kay, J. D., Gunter, D., Head-Gordon, M., Hura, G. L., Pande, V. S., Wemmer, D. E., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b06543 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Best, R. B., Zheng, W., & Mittal, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-10-16
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5113-5124
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2327000477
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.