Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Semiempirical Quantum Chemical PM6 Method Augmented by Dispersion and H-Bonding Correction Terms Reliably Describes Various Types of Noncovalent Complexes

Řezáč, Jan, Fanfrlík, Jindřich, Salahub, Dennis, Hobza, Pavel·2009·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Abstract

Because of its construction and parametrization for more than 80 elements, the semiempirical quantum chemical PM6 method is superior to other similar methods. Despite its advantages, however, the PM6 method fails for the description of noncovalent interactions, specifically the dispersion energy and H-bonding. Upon inclusion of correction terms for dispersion and H-bonding, the performance of the method was found to be dramatically improved. The former correction included two parameters in the damping function that were parametrized to reproduce the benchmark interaction energies [CCSD(T)/complete basis set (CBS) limit] of the dispersion-bonded complexes from the S22 data set. The latter correction was parametrized on an extended set of H-bonded stabilization energies determined at the MP2/cc-pVTZ level. The resulting PM6-DH method was tested on the S22 data set, for which chemical accuracy (error < 1 kcal/mol) was achieved, and also on the JSCH2005 set, for which significant improvement over the original PM6 method was also obtained. Implementation of analytical gradients allows very efficient geometry optimization, which, for all complexes, provides better agreement with the benchmark data. Excellent results were also achieved for small peptides, and here again, chemical accuracy was obtained (i.e., the error with respect to CCSD(T)/CBS results was smaller than 1 kcal/mol). The performance of the technique was finally demonstrated on extended complexes, namely, the porphine dimer and various graphene models with DNA bases and base pairs, where the PM6-DH stabilization energies agree very well with available benchmark data obtained with DFT-D, SCS-MP2, and MP2.5 methods. The PM6-DH calculations are very efficient and can be routinely applied for systems of up to 1000 atoms. For nonaromatic systems, the use of a linear scaling version of the SCF procedure based on localized orbitals speeds up the method significantly and allows one to investigate systems with several thousand atoms. The method can thus replace force fields, which face basic problems for the description of quantum effects, in many applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ct9000922

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Řezáč, J., Fanfrlík, J., Salahub, D., & Hobza, P.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2009-05-26
Volume
5
Issue
7
Pages
1749-1760
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W1995818918
Cited by
355
References
0
FWCI
13.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semiempirical Quantum Chemical PM6 Method Augmented by Dispersion and H-Bonding Correction Terms Reliably Describes Various Types of Noncovalent Complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ct9000922
The paper
Řezáč, J., Fanfrlík, J., Salahub, D., & Hobza, P. (2009). Semiempirical Quantum Chemical PM6 Method Augmented by Dispersion and H-Bonding Correction Terms Reliably Describes Various Types of Noncovalent Complexes. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct9000922

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.