The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Semiempirical Quantum Chemical PM6 Method Augmented by Dispersion and H-Bonding Correction Terms Reliably Describes Various Types of Noncovalent Complexes
Abstract
Because of its construction and parametrization for more than 80 elements, the semiempirical quantum chemical PM6 method is superior to other similar methods. Despite its advantages, however, the PM6 method fails for the description of noncovalent interactions, specifically the dispersion energy and H-bonding. Upon inclusion of correction terms for dispersion and H-bonding, the performance of the method was found to be dramatically improved. The former correction included two parameters in the damping function that were parametrized to reproduce the benchmark interaction energies [CCSD(T)/complete basis set (CBS) limit] of the dispersion-bonded complexes from the S22 data set. The latter correction was parametrized on an extended set of H-bonded stabilization energies determined at the MP2/cc-pVTZ level. The resulting PM6-DH method was tested on the S22 data set, for which chemical accuracy (error < 1 kcal/mol) was achieved, and also on the JSCH2005 set, for which significant improvement over the original PM6 method was also obtained. Implementation of analytical gradients allows very efficient geometry optimization, which, for all complexes, provides better agreement with the benchmark data. Excellent results were also achieved for small peptides, and here again, chemical accuracy was obtained (i.e., the error with respect to CCSD(T)/CBS results was smaller than 1 kcal/mol). The performance of the technique was finally demonstrated on extended complexes, namely, the porphine dimer and various graphene models with DNA bases and base pairs, where the PM6-DH stabilization energies agree very well with available benchmark data obtained with DFT-D, SCS-MP2, and MP2.5 methods. The PM6-DH calculations are very efficient and can be routinely applied for systems of up to 1000 atoms. For nonaromatic systems, the use of a linear scaling version of the SCF procedure based on localized orbitals speeds up the method significantly and allows one to investigate systems with several thousand atoms. The method can thus replace force fields, which face basic problems for the description of quantum effects, in many applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Riley, K. E., Pitoňák, M., Jurečka, P., & Hobza, P. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1000173 · Cited by 759
Self-citationChristensen, A. S., Kubař, T., Cui, Q., & Elstner, M. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00584 · Cited by 446
In silico Design of Porous Polymer Networks: High-Throughput Screening for Methane Storage Materials
Martin, R. L., Simon, C. M., Smit, B., & Haranczyk, M. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja4123939 · Cited by 170
Computational tools to model halogen bonds in medicinal chemistry.
Ford, M. C., & Ho, P. S. (2016) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00997 · Cited by 143
Stigliani, J.-L., Bernardes-Génisson, V., Bernadou, J., & Pratviel, G. (2012) · Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c2ob25602a · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Řezáč, J., Fanfrlík, J., Salahub, D., & Hobza, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-05-26
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1749-1760
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W1995818918
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semiempirical Quantum Chemical PM6 Method Augmented by Dispersion and H-Bonding Correction Terms Reliably Describes Various Types of Noncovalent Complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ct9000922
- The paper
- Řezáč, J., Fanfrlík, J., Salahub, D., & Hobza, P. (2009). Semiempirical Quantum Chemical PM6 Method Augmented by Dispersion and H-Bonding Correction Terms Reliably Describes Various Types of Noncovalent Complexes. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct9000922
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.