Cited by 170Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsCovalent Organic Framework ApplicationsMachine Learning in Materials Science

In silico Design of Porous Polymer Networks: High-Throughput Screening for Methane Storage Materials

Open access
Martin, Richard L., Simon, Cory M., Smit, Berend, Haranczyk, Maciej·2014·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Porous polymer networks (PPNs) are a class of advanced porous materials that combine the advantages of cheap and stable polymers with the high surface areas and tunable chemistry of metal-organic frameworks. They are of particular interest for gas separation or storage applications, for instance, as methane adsorbents for a vehicular natural gas tank or other portable applications. PPNs are self-assembled from distinct building units; here, we utilize commercially available chemical fragments and two experimentally known synthetic routes to design in silico a large database of synthetically realistic PPN materials. All structures from our database of 18,000 materials have been relaxed with semiempirical electronic structure methods and characterized with Grand-canonical Monte Carlo simulations for methane uptake and deliverable (working) capacity. A number of novel structure-property relationships that govern methane storage performance were identified. The relationships are translated into experimental guidelines to realize the ideal PPN structure. We found that cooperative methane-methane attractions were present in all of the best-performing materials, highlighting the importance of guest interaction in the design of optimal materials for methane storage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja4123939

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Demonstrations have included the screening of the more than 13k MOFs in the ToBaCCo set for hydrogen storage or other similarly large MOF sets for methane storage.

    “Demonstrations have included the screening of the more than 13k MOFs in the ToBaCCo set (28) for hydrogen storage (47) or other similarly large MOF sets for methane storage (39, 48).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, R. L., Simon, C. M., Smit, B., & Haranczyk, M.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2014-03-24
Volume
136
Issue
13
Pages
5006-5022
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2009317314
Cited by
170
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 5
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (DE-AR0000249)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Covalent Organic Framework Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
porous polymer networks, methane storage, methane adsorption, high-throughput screening, structure-property relationships, gas storage materials, grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation, self-assembled polymers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review