Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Screening of CO2 Adsorbing Materials for Zero Emission Power Generation Systems

Feng, Bo, An, Hui, Tan, Eddie·2007·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

The global warming issue has resulted in a great demand in zero emission power generation systems. Recently a few new concepts have been proposed that promise to achieve zero emissions while delivering unprecedentedly high efficiency. In these concepts, CO 2 adsorbing material (CAM) is a key component. This paper reviews briefly the current development in CO 2 adsorbing material, screens the potential materials under the conditions relevant to those in zero emission power generation systems, and identifies the best candidate and the optimum operating conditions for the production of high-purity hydrogen. It is found that CaO is thermodynamically the best candidate among metal oxides for CO 2 capture in zero emission power generation systems. There exists a region within which high-purity H 2 can be produced in steam methane reforming and carbon gasification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ef0604036

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Feng, B., An, H., & Tan, E.
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2007-01-06
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
426-434
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W1966707543
Cited by
224
References
0
FWCI
24.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.