The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stability, Lubricity, Viscosity, and Cold-Flow Properties of Alcohol−Diesel Blends
Abstract
Alcohols have an interesting potential as blending components for diesel fuels because of their capacity to reduce soot formation. Because they have increasing routes for their production from renewable sources, they could contribute toward increasing the renewable fraction of these fuels and, therefore, toward reducing the impact of diesel transportation on the global warming effect. To increase the knowledge about the implications of the use of short- and long-chain alcohols/diesel fuel blends in diesel engines, the stability, lubricity, viscosity, and cold filter plugging point (CFPP) have been tested. Blends of methanol, ethanol, propanol, butanol, and pentanol with diesel fuel have been analyzed at 1, 2.5, 7.7, 17, 50, 75, and 90% in volume [including 95% (v/v) in the case of CFPP]. Results have shown that short-chain alcohols depict poor blending stability and low viscosity (mainly for concentrations of ethanol and propanol in diesel fuel blends beyond 22 and 45%, respectively). A synergistic effect was observed in viscosity when moderate concentrations of butanol and pentanol were mixed with diesel fuel. The lubricity of the blends decreases with the alcohol content, but this effect is partially compensated by the alcohol volatility. The blends with the highest restriction of use are those containing pentanol, which should be limited to concentrations below 10% (v/v), because its volatility does not compensate for its lubricating capacity. The use of alcohol/winter diesel fuel blends provides a substantial benefit only when high alcohol concentrations are used. It can be concluded that alcohols can be blended with diesel fuel under low and high concentrations, although to improve the blending stability of short-chain alcohols in medium concentrations, the use of additives or fatty acid esters would be necessary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thermodynamic efficiency of biomass gasification and biofuels conversion
Ptasinski, K. J. (2008) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.65 · Cited by 111
Cited by
A comparison of performance of higher alcohols/diesel fuel blends in a diesel engine
Campos-Fernández, J., Arnal, J. M., Gómez, J., & Dorado, M. P. (2012) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.051 · Cited by 366
Self-citationA comprehensive review on the environmental impacts of diesel/biodiesel additives
Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Tabatabaei, M., Aghbashlo, M., Khanali, M., & Demirbas, A. (2018) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.050 · Cited by 356
Ağbulut, Ü., Yeşilyurt, M. K., & Sarıdemir, S. (2021) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.119942 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Lapuerta, M., García-Contreras, R., Campos-Fernández, J., & Dorado, M. P.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-07-14
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4497-4502
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2021859064
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stability, Lubricity, Viscosity, and Cold-Flow Properties of Alcohol−Diesel Blends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ef100498u
- The paper
- Lapuerta, M., García-Contreras, R., Campos-Fernández, J., & Dorado, M. P. (2010). Stability, Lubricity, Viscosity, and Cold-Flow Properties of Alcohol−Diesel Blends. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef100498u
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.