The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oxidative Degradation of Aminosilica Adsorbents Relevant to Postcombustion CO2 Capture
Abstract
Coal-fired power plant flue gas exhaust typically contains 3–10% oxygen. While it is known that the monoethanolamine (MEA) oxidative degradation rate is a critical parameter affecting liquid amine absorption processes, the effect of oxygen on the stability of solid amine adsorbents remains unexplored. Here, oxidative degradation of aminosilica materials is studied under accelerated oxidizing conditions to assess the stability of different supported amine structures to oxidizing conditions. Adsorbents constructed using four different silane coupling agents are evaluated, three with a single primary, secondary, or tertiary amine at the end of a propyl surface linker, with the fourth having one secondary propylamine separated from a primary amine by an ethyl linker. Under the experimental conditions used in this study, it was found that both amine type and proximity had a significant effect on oxidative degradation rates. In particular, the supported primary and tertiary amines proved to be stable to the oxidizing conditions used, whereas the secondary amines degraded at elevated treatment temperatures. Because secondary amines are important components of many supported amine adsorbents, it is suggested that the oxidative stability of such species needs to be carefully considered in assessments of postcombustion CO 2 capture processes based on supported amines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sing, K. S. W. (1985) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac198557040603 · Cited by 24,485
Cited by
Direct Capture of CO2 from Ambient Air
Sanz-Pérez, E. S., Murdock, C. R., Didas, S. A., & Jones, C. W. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00173 · Cited by 2,406
Self-citationAir as the renewable carbon source of the future: an overview of CO2 capture from the atmosphere
Goeppert, A., Czaun, M., Surya Prakash, G. K., & Olah, G. A. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21586a · Cited by 724
Porous materials for carbon dioxide separations
Siegelman, R. L., Kim, E. J., & Long, J. R. (2021) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-021-01054-8 · Cited by 722
Carbon dioxide utilization with C–N bond formation: carbon dioxide capture and subsequent conversion
Yang, Z.-Z., He, L.-N., Gao, J., Liu, A.-H., & Yu, B. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee02774g · Cited by 520
Hedin, N., Andersson, L., Bergström, L., & Yan, J. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.034 · Cited by 424
Metadata
- Authors
- Bollini, P., Choi, S., Drese, J. H., & Jones, C. W.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-04-22
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2416-2425
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2318775926
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.