Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 419

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-Pressure Methane Adsorption and Characterization of Pores in Posidonia Shales and Isolated Kerogens

Open access
Rexer, Thomas F., Mathia, Eliza J., Aplin, Andrew C., Thomas, K. Mark·2014·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

Sorption capacities and pore characteristics of bulk shales and isolated kerogens have been determined for immature, oil-window, and gas-window mature samples from the Lower Toarcian Posidonia shale formation. Dubinin–Radushkevich (DR) micropore volumes, sorption pore volumes, and surface areas of shales and kerogens were determined from CO 2 adsorption isotherms at −78 and 0 °C, and from N 2 adsorption isotherms at −196 °C. Mercury injection capillary pressure porosimetry, grain density measurements, and helium pycnometry were used to determine shale and kerogen densities and total pore volumes. Total porosities decrease through the oil-window and then increase into the gas-window. High-pressure methane isotherms up to 14 MPa were determined at 45, 65, and 85 °C on dry shale and at 45 and 65 °C on kerogen. Methane excess uptakes at 65 °C and 11.5 MPa were in the range 0.056–0.110 mmol g –1 (40–78 scf t –1 ) for dry Posidonia shales and 0.36–0.70 mmol g –1 (253–499 scf t –1 ) for the corresponding dry kerogens. Absolute methane isotherms were calculated by correcting for the gas at bulk gas phase density in the sorption pore volume. The enthalpies of CH 4 adsorption for shales and kerogens at zero surface coverage showed no significant variation with maturity, indicating that the sorption pore volume is the primary control on sorption uptake. The sum of pore volumes measured by (a) CO 2 sorption at −78 °C and (b) mercury injection, are similar to the total porosity for shales. Since mercury in our experiments occupies pores with constrictions larger than ca. 6 nm, we infer that porosity measured by CO 2 adsorption at −78 °C in the samples used in this study is largely within pores with effective diameters smaller than 6 nm. The linear correlation between maximum CH 4 surface excess sorption and CO 2 sorption pore volume at −78 °C is very strong for both shales and kerogens, and goes through the origin, suggesting that the vast majority of sorbed CH 4 occurs in pores smaller than 6 nm. The DR micropore volume obtained from CO 2 adsorption at 0 °C was 40%–62% of the corresponding CO 2 sorption pore volume. Sorption mass balances using kerogen and shale isotherms showed that approximately half of the CO 2 sorption in these dry shales is in organic matter, with the rest likely to be associated with the inorganic phase (mainly clay minerals). A similar distribution was observed for supercritical CH 4 adsorption. Mass balances for adsorption isotherms for kerogen and clay minerals do not always account for the total measured sorbed CH 4 on dry shales, suggesting that some sorption may not be completely accounted for by the minerals identified and kerogens in the shales.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ef402466m

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 419

Metadata

Authors
Rexer, T. F., Mathia, E. J., Aplin, A. C., & Thomas, K. M.
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2014-04-14
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
2886-2901
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W2034472342
Cited by
419
References
2
FWCI
30.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Pressure Methane Adsorption and Characterization of Pores in Posidonia Shales and Isolated Kerogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ef402466m
The paper
Rexer, T. F., Mathia, E. J., Aplin, A. C., & Thomas, K. M. (2014). High-Pressure Methane Adsorption and Characterization of Pores in Posidonia Shales and Isolated Kerogens. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef402466m

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.