The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Thermal Cracking of Virgin and Waste Plastics of PP and LDPE in a Semibatch Reactor under Atmospheric Pressure
Open accessAbstract
Study of the decomposition kinetics, pyrolysis products, and even reaction mechanisms plays an important role for the development of polymer recycling. In the present research, the kinetics of virgin and waste polypropylene (PP) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) were studied by a modified Coats–Redfern method. Afterward, thermal cracking of them in a semibatch reactor under atmospheric pressure in nitrogen has been investigated. Both virgin and waste plastics are decomposed at 420–460 °C, and the products have been characterized using GC, FT-IR, 1 H NMR, and GC-MS. The reaction path and the degradation mechanism for the thermal cracking of polymer in this study were also discussed. The lower activation energy of waste PP and LDPE indicates that waste plastics degrade at lower initial temperature and may favor mild conditions. Due to the short residence time, the higher gaseous and liquid yields were obtained for virgin PP and LDPE. A large amount of residues for waste polymer indicates that it is a favorable way to degrade waste plastics in a semibatch reactor without further separation. Chain scission reactions are the predominant degradation mechanism in this thermal cracking process. The significant content of unsaturated hydrocarbons in PP thermal cracking products shows the intramolecular hydrogen transfer and β-scission reactions are predominant. In the case of LDPE, intermolecular hydrogen transfer and β-disproportionate reactions also occur. For thermal cracking polymer in a semibatch reactor under atmospheric pressure, the high yields of gasoline (C 6 –C 12 ) and diesel (C 13 –C 22 ) fraction in liquid products confirm that it is a desirable way to realize waste plastics recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanical and chemical recycling of solid plastic waste
Ragaert, K., Delva, L., & Van Geem, K. (2017) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.044 · Cited by 3,276
Lopez, G., Artetxe, M., Amutio, M., Bilbao, J., & Olazar, M. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.142 · Cited by 897
Pyrolysis for plastic waste management: An engineering perspective
Xayachak, T., Haque, N., Parthasarathy, R., King, S., Emami, N., Lau, D., & Pramanik, B. K. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2022.108865 · Cited by 127
Wu, Q., Lv, X., Xu, N., Xin, L., Lin, G., Chen, K., & He, M. (2023) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2023.118492 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, G., Jing, X., Wen, H., & Xiang, S.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-04-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2289-2298
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2331117183
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thermal Cracking of Virgin and Waste Plastics of PP and LDPE in a Semibatch Reactor under Atmospheric Pressure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ef502919f
- The paper
- Yan, G., Jing, X., Wen, H., & Xiang, S. (2015). Thermal Cracking of Virgin and Waste Plastics of PP and LDPE in a Semibatch Reactor under Atmospheric Pressure. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef502919f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.