Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantification of the Soot-Water Distribution Coefficient of PAHs Provides Mechanistic Basis for Enhanced Sorption Observations

Bucheli, Thomas D., Gustafsson, Örjan·2000·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

There is an increasing recognition of the necessity to consider the heterogeneity of geosorbents, and in particular the condensed carbon facies fraction, to improve prediction of hydrophobic pollutant phase speciation. Field observations of much elevated organic-carbon normalized distribution coefficients ( K oc ) of PAHs relative to predictions from bulk organic-matter partitioning models have been suggested to be explainable by soot sorption. To afford testing of this hypothesis, we here report on the soot-water distribution coefficients ( K sc ) for a series of PAHs (naphthalene (NP), fluorene (FL), phenanthrene (PH), and pyrene (PY)) using diesel particulate matter (NIST standard reference material SRM-1650) as model soot sorbent. Specifically adapted batch and column experiments yielded average log K sc values of 5.23, 5.40, 5.82, and 6.59 (batch) and 4.63, 6.03, 6.62, and 7.03 (column) for NP, FL, PH, and PY, respectively (all data in [L w /kg sc ]). The obtained values are 35−250 times higher than respective K oc predictions and are considerably closer to theoretically estimated soot-water distribution coefficients. Our data are among the highest solid-water distribution coefficients of an environmentally relevant sorbent ever reported and lend direct empirical support of active soot sorption as a viable explanation to the enhanced PAH partitioning. Sorption kinetics on the hours-days time scale and similarity of external geometric and BET surface areas suggest that interaction sites are largely restricted to the outer surface of the soot. The constrained K sc values facilitate prediction of speciation and bioavailable exposures of PAHs in aquatic and sedimentary environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es000092s

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
Bucheli, T. D., & Gustafsson, Ö.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2000-11-16
Volume
34
Issue
24
Pages
5144-5151
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2023083456
Cited by
361
References
1
FWCI
14.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.