Measurement of sorption isotherms with flow-through reactors
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTMeasurement of Sorption Isotherms with Flow-Through ReactorsDaniel. Grolimund, Michal. Borkovec, Peter. Federer, and Hans. SticherCite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 9, 2317–2321Publication Date (Print):September 1, 1995Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 September 1995https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es00009a025https://doi.org/10.1021/es00009a025research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views325Altmetric-Citations46LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose Get e-Alerts
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most discrepancies between column and batch methods can be traced to artifacts in experiment implementation or data interpretation for one or both methods.
“In the majority of cases, the discrepancy can typically be traced to artifacts associated with experiment implementation or data interpretation for one or both methods”
From Column versus batch methods for measuring PFOS and PFOA sorption to geomedia (2021) · cites this paper as Grolimund et al., 1995
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Column versus batch methods for measuring PFOS and PFOA sorption to geomedia
Van Glubt, S., Brusseau, M. L., Yan, N., Huang, D., Khan, N., & Carroll, K. C. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115917 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grolimund, D., Borkovec, M., Federer, P., & Sticher, H.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1995-09-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2317-2321
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2012321462
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Keywords
- sorption isotherms, flow-through reactor, adsorption, sorption kinetics, contaminant transport, reactive transport modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
