The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sorption of Veterinary Pharmaceuticals in Soils: A Review
Abstract
Veterinary pharmaceuticals (VPs) are used in large amounts in modern husbandry. Due to their use pattern, they possess a potential for reaching the soil environment. To assess their mobility in soil, the literature on sorption of chemicals used as VPs is reviewed and put into perspective of their physicochemical properties. The compilation of sorption coefficients to soil solids (Kd,solid) demonstrates that these chemicals display a wide range of mobility (0.2 < Kd,solid < 6,000 L/kg). Partition coefficients for association of tetracycline and quinolone carboxylic acid VPs to dissolved organic matter (Kd,DOM) vary between 100 and 50,000 L/kg. The variation in Kd,solid for a given compound in different soils can be significant. For most of the compounds, the variation is not considerably lower for the organic carbon-normalized sorption coefficient Koc. In addition, prediction of log Koc by log Kow leads to significant underestimation of log Koc and log Kd,DOM values. This suggests that mechanisms other than hydrophobic partitioning play a significant role in sorption of VPs. A number of hydrophobicity-independent mechanisms such as cation exchange, cation bridging at clay surfaces, surface complexation, and hydrogen bonding appear to be involved. These processes are not accounted for by organic carbon normalization, suggesting that this data treatment is conceptually inappropriate and fails to describe the sorption behavior. Moreover, prediction of log Koc based on the hydrophobicity parameter log Kow is not successful.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Occurrence of Antibiotics in the Aquatic Environment
Hirsch, R., Ternes, T., Haberer, K., & Kratz, K.-L. (1999) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00337-4 · Cited by 2,140
Cited by
Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., & Buxton, H. T. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011055j · Cited by 7,953
Sarmah, A. K., Meyer, M. T., & Boxall, A. B. A. (2006) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.026 · Cited by 3,326
Patel, M., Kumar, R., Kishor, K., Mlsna, T., Pittman, C. U., & Mohan, D. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00299 · Cited by 2,654
Petrie, B., Barden, R., & Kasprzyk-Hordern, B. (2015) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.053 · Cited by 2,614
Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the freshwater aquatic environment
Ebele, A. J., Abou-Elwafa Abdallah, M., & Harrad, S. (2017) · Emerging Contaminants · doi:10.1016/j.emcon.2016.12.004 · Cited by 2,023
Metadata
- Authors
- Tolls, J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-08-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3397-3406
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1988286516
- Cited by
- 1,388
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.