Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 452

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Arsenate and Arsenite Removal by Zerovalent Iron: Kinetics, Redox Transformation, and Implications for in Situ Groundwater Remediation

Su, Chunming, Puls, Robert W.·2001·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Batch tests were performed utilizing four zerovalent iron (Fe0) filings (Fisher, Peerless, Master Builders, and Aldrich) to remove As(V) and As(III) from water. One gram of metal was reacted headspace-free at 23 degrees C for up to 5 days in the dark with 41.5 mL of 2 mg L(-1) As(V), or As(III) or As(V) + As(III) (1:1) in 0.01 M NaCl. Arsenic removal on a mass basis followed the order: Fisher > Peerless Master Builders > Aldrich; whereas, on a surface area basis the order became: Fisher > Aldrich > Peerless Master Builders. Arsenic concentration decreased exponentially with time, and was below 0.01 mg L(-1) in 4 days with the exception of Aldrich Fe0. More As(III) was sorbed than As(V) by Peerless Fe0 in the initial As concentration range between 2 and 100 mg L(-1). No As(III) was detected by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) on Peerless Fe0 at 5 days when As(V) was the initial arsenic species in the solution. As(III) was detected by XPS at 30 and 60 days present on Peerless Fe0, when As(V) was the initial arsenic species in the solution. Likewise, As(V) was found on Peerless Fe0 when As(II) was added to the solution. A steady distribution of As(V) (73-76%) and As(III) (22-25%) was achieved at 30 and 60 days on the Peerless Fe0 when either As(V) or As(III) was the initial added species. The presence of both reducing species (Fe0 and Fe2+) and an oxidizing species (MnO2) in Peerless Fe0 is probably responsible for the coexistence of both As(V) and As(III) on Fe0 surfaces. The desorption of As(V) and As(III) by phosphate extraction decreased as the residence time of interaction between the sorbents and arsenic increased from 1 to 60 days. The results suggest that both As(V) and As(III) formed stronger surface complexes or migrated further inside the interior of the sorbent with increasing time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es001607i

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 452

Metadata

Authors
Su, C., & Puls, R. W.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2001-02-13
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
1487-1492
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W1980411953
Cited by
452
References
2
FWCI
13.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arsenate and Arsenite Removal by Zerovalent Iron: Kinetics, Redox Transformation, and Implications for in Situ Groundwater Remediation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es001607i
The paper
Su, C., & Puls, R. W. (2001). Arsenate and Arsenite Removal by Zerovalent Iron: Kinetics, Redox Transformation, and Implications for in Situ Groundwater Remediation. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es001607i

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.