The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lead Immobilization Using Phosphoric Acid in a Smelter-Contaminated Urban Soil
Abstract
Transformation of soil lead (Pb) to pyromorphite, a lead phosphate, may be a cost-effective remedial strategy for immobilizing soil Pb and reducing Pb bioavailability. Soil treatment using phosphoric acid (H3PO4) was assessed for its efficacy to reduce Pb solubility and bioaccessibility. Soil containing 4,360 mg of Pb kg(-1), collected from a smelter-contaminated site in Joplin, MO, was reacted with 1,250, 2,500, 5,000, and 10,000 mg of P kg(-1) as H3PO4. The reaction was followed by measurements of Pb bioaccessibility, solubility products, and microprobe analyses. Soluble Pb concentration in the soil decreased with increasing H3PO4 addition. Adding 10,000 mg of P kg(-1) reduced bioaccessible Pb by 60%. The logarithm of bioaccessible Pb decreased as a linear function of increasing H3PO4 addition with an R2 of 0.989. A higher soil/solution ratio was required to extract bioaccessible Pb after the treatment. Microprobe analyses showed that the Pb particles contained P and Cl after the reaction, and the spectra generated by the wavelength-dispersive spectrometer were similar to those of synthetic chloropyromorphite. Lead solubility in the P-treated soil was less than predicted for hydroxypyromorphite [Pbs(PO4)3-OH] and greater than predicted for chloropyromorphite [Pbs(PO4)3Cl]. The P treatment caused approximately 23% redistribution of soil Pb from the clay and silt size fractions to the sand fraction. Soil treatment with H3PO4 resulted in the formation of a compound similar to chloropyromorphite and reduced bioaccessibility of soil Pb, which may have a potential as an in situ technique for Pb-contaminated soil remediation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Survival of three tree species on old reclaimed surface mines in Ohio
Zeleznik, J. D., & Skousen, J. G. (1996) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq1996.00472425002500060037x · Cited by 90
Cited by
Phosphates for Pb immobilization in soils: a review
Miretzky, P., & Fernandez-Cirelli, A. (2008) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-007-0133-y · Cited by 298
In Situ Soil Treatments to Reduce the Phyto- and Bioavailability of Lead, Zinc, and Cadmium
Brown, S., Chaney, R., Hallfrisch, J., Ryan, J. A., & Berti, W. R. (2004) · Journal of Environment Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2004.0522 · Cited by 276
Sanderson, P., Naidu, R., Bolan, N., Lim, J. E., & Ok, Y. S. (2015) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.06.056 · Cited by 69
Moragaspitiya, C., Rajapakse, J., & Millar, G. J. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jes.2020.04.023 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, J., Mosby, D. E., Casteel, S. W., & Blanchar, R. W.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-07-27
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3553-3559
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2047928669
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lead Immobilization Using Phosphoric Acid in a Smelter-Contaminated Urban Soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es001770d
- The paper
- Yang, J., Mosby, D. E., Casteel, S. W., & Blanchar, R. W. (2001). Lead Immobilization Using Phosphoric Acid in a Smelter-Contaminated Urban Soil. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es001770d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.