The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Solubility-Normalized Combined Adsorption-Partitioning Sorption Isotherms for Organic Pollutants
Abstract
Equilibrium sorption isotherms were measured for five different low-polarity organic compounds (benzene, trichloroethene, 1,2- and 1,4-dichlorobenzene, and phenanthrene) over a wide concentration range. The investigated sorbents can be grouped into the following three classes: (1) humic soil organic matter, which shows linear sorption isotherms (solely partitioning, as observed in the peat sample); (2) carbon materials, which were thermally altered (due to their natural history or industrial production) and thus contain a high specific surface area and exhibit nonlinear isotherms, and (3) pure engineered microporous materials (e.g., zeolites and activated carbon), where adsorption is solely due to a pore-filling process. Sorption of all compounds was fitted very well by the Polanyi-Dubinin-Manes (PDM) model, which for sorbents containing humic organic matter (e.g., peat) was combined with linear partitioning. Both the partitioning and the Polanyi-Dubinin-Manes model predict unique sorption isotherms of similar compounds if the solubility-normalized aqueous concentration is used. In addition, an inverse linear relationship between the distribution coefficient (Kd) and water solubility, which was very well confirmed by the data, is obtained. This also leads to unit-equivalent Freundlich sorption isotherms and explains the often observed apparent correlation between sorption capacity at a given concentration (e.g., Freundlich coefficient) and sorption nonlinearity (Freundlich exponent).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Compositions and sorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars
Chun, Y., Sheng, G., Chiou, C. T., & Xing, B. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es035034w · Cited by 1,079
(2010) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2788/472 · Cited by 851
Adsorption of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Carbon Nanomaterials
Yang, K., Zhu, L., & Xing, B. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es052208w · Cited by 771
Catechol and Humic Acid Sorption onto a Range of Laboratory-Produced Black Carbons (Biochars)
Kasozi, G. N., Zimmerman, A. R., Nkedi-Kizza, P., & Gao, B. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es1014423 · Cited by 509
Cornelissen, G., & Gustafsson, Ö. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es034776m · Cited by 290
Schmidt, H., Pandit, B., Martinsen, V., Cornelissen, G., Conte, P., & Kammann, C. (2015) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture5030723 · Cited by 187
Sorption of Deisopropylatrazine on Broiler Litter Biochars
Uchimiya, M., Wartelle, L. H., Lima, I. M., & Klasson, K. T. (2010) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf102152q · Cited by 182
Pandit, N. R., Mulder, J., Hale, S. E., Schmidt, H. P., & Cornelissen, G. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176378 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Kleineidam, S., Schüth, C., & Grathwohl, P.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-10-04
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4689-4697
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2000436718
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.