The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arsenate and Arsenite Removal by Zerovalent Iron: Effects of Phosphate, Silicate, Carbonate, Borate, Sulfate, Chromate, Molybdate, and Nitrate, Relative to Chloride
Abstract
Batch tests were performed to evaluate the effects of inorganic anion competition on the kinetics of arsenate (As(V)) and arsenite (As(III)) removal by zerovalent iron (Peerless Fe0) in aqueous solution. The oxyanions underwent either sorption-dominated reactions (phosphate, silicate, carbonate, borate, and sulfate) or reduction-dominated reactions (chromate, molybdate, and nitrate) with Peerless Fe0 in the presence of As(V) or As(III), relative to chloride. Pseudo-first-order rate equations were found to describe satisfactorily both As(V) and As(III) removal kinetics in the presence of each competing anion. Of the oxyanions tested for Peerless Fe0 in the pH range from 7 to 9, phosphate caused the greatest decrease in As removal rate (7.0 x 10(-3) to 18.5 x 10(-3) h(-1)) relative to chloride (34.9 x 10(-3) to 36.2 x 10(-3) h(-1)). Silicate, chromate, and molybdate also caused strong inhibition of As removal, followed by carbonate and nitrate, whereas borate and sulfate only caused slight inhibition to As(III) removal. Present results show that Peerless Fe0 may be an excellent permeable reactive barrier medium for a suite of mixed inorganic contaminants. The anion competing effects should be considered when designing permeable reactive barriers composed of zerovalent iron for field applications to remediate As(V) and As(III).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arsenate and Chromate Retention Mechanisms on Goethite. 1. Surface Structure
Fendorf, S., Eick, M. J., Grossl, P., & Sparks, D. L. (1997) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es950653t · Cited by 1,017
Cited by
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 · Cited by 3,536
Guan, X., Sun, Y., Qin, H., Li, J., Lo, I. M. C., He, D., & Dong, H. (2015) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.034 · Cited by 962
Pan, B., Wu, J., Pan, B., Lv, L., Zhang, W., Xiao, L., Wang, X., Tao, X., & Zheng, S. (2009) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.055 · Cited by 306
Tang, R., Gong, D., Deng, Y., Xiong, S., Zheng, J., Li, L., Zhou, Z., Su, L., & Zhao, J. (2022) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126944 · Cited by 280
Arsenic Removal with Composite Iron Matrix Filters in Bangladesh: A Field and Laboratory Study
Neumann, A., Kaegi, R., Voegelin, A., Hussam, A., Munir, A. K. M., & Hug, S. J. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es305176x · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Su, C., & Puls, R. W.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-10-13
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 4562-4568
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1989006813
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arsenate and Arsenite Removal by Zerovalent Iron: Effects of Phosphate, Silicate, Carbonate, Borate, Sulfate, Chromate, Molybdate, and Nitrate, Relative to Chloride. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es010768z
- The paper
- Su, C., & Puls, R. W. (2001). Arsenate and Arsenite Removal by Zerovalent Iron: Effects of Phosphate, Silicate, Carbonate, Borate, Sulfate, Chromate, Molybdate, and Nitrate, Relative to Chloride. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es010768z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.