Cited by 189Arsenic contamination and mitigationEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsWater Treatment and Disinfection

Arsenic Removal with Composite Iron Matrix Filters in Bangladesh: A Field and Laboratory Study

Open access
Neumann, Anke, Kaegi, Ralf, Voegelin, Andreas, Hussam, Abul, Munir, Abul K. M., Hug, Stephan J.·2013·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The main arsenic mitigation measures in Bangladesh, well-switching and deep tube wells, have reduced As exposure, but water treatment is important where As-free water is not available. Zero-valent iron (ZVI) based SONO household filters, developed in Bangladesh, remove As by corrosion of locally available inexpensive surplus iron and sand filtration in two buckets. We investigated As removal in SONO filters in the field and laboratory, covering a range of typical groundwater concentrations (in mg/L) of As (0.14-0.96), Fe (0-17), P (0-4.4), Ca (45-162), and Mn (0-2.8). Depending on influent Fe(II) concentrations, 20-80% As was removed in the top sand layer, but As removal to safe levels occurred in the ZVI-layer of the first bucket. Residual As, Fe, and Mn were removed after re-aeration in the sand of the second bucket. New and over 8-year-old filters removed As to <50 μg/L and mostly to <10 μg/L and Mn to <0.2 mg/L. Vertical concentration profiles revealed formation of Fe(II) by corrosion of Fe(0) with O2 and incorporation of As into forming amorphous Fe phases in the composite iron matrix (CIM) of newer filters and predominantly magnetite in older filters. As mass balances indicated that users filtered less than reported volumes of water, pointing to the need for more educational efforts. All tested SONO filters provided safe drinking water without replacement for up to over 8 years of use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es305176x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One of the major problems encountered on the field by adsorption methods is the presence of high iron content in groundwater, which emanates into clogging of the filter material thereby reducing the lifetime of the filter.

    “One of the major problems encountered on the field by aforesaid adsorption methods is the presence of high iron content in groundwater, which emanates into clogging of the filter material thereby reducing the lifetime of the filter [178, 185].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. Nickson R., 1998, Nature, 395, 338, 10.1038/26387 · DOI
  2. Nickson R. T., 2000, Appl. Geochem., 15, 403, 10.1016/S0883-2927(99)00086-4 · DOI
  3. Kinniburgh D., 2001, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: Challenges of the Millennium, 230
  4. Kinniburgh D. G., 2001, British Geological Survey, DPHE. Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh
  5. Harvey C. F., 2002, Science, 298, 1602, 10.1126/science.1076978 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hug S. J., 2008, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 6318, 10.1021/es7028284 · DOI
  7. UNICEF, 2009, Bangladesh national drinking water quality survey, 2011
  8. Van Geen A., 2007, J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 42, 1729, 10.1080/10934520701564236 · DOI
  9. Hug S. J., 2011, Appl. Geochem., 26, 1077, 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.03.012 · DOI · Paper page
  10. McArthur J. M., 2012, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 669, 10.1021/es202673n · DOI
  11. Johnston R. B., 2010, Nat. Geosci., 3, 2, 10.1038/ngeo735 · DOI
  12. Hussam A., 2007, J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 42, 1869, 10.1080/10934520701567122 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Manning B. A., 2002, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 976, 10.1021/es0110170 · DOI
  14. Manning B. A., 2002, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 5455, 10.1021/es0206846 · DOI
  15. Bang S., 2005, Wat. Res., 39, 763, 10.1016/j.watres.2004.12.022 · DOI
  16. Bang S., 2005, J. Hazard. Mater., 121, 61, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.01.030 · DOI
  17. Kanel S. R., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 1291, 10.1021/es048991u · DOI
  18. Leupin O. X., 2005, Water. Res., 39, 1729, 10.1016/j.watres.2005.02.012 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Leupin O. X., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8032, 10.1021/es050205d · DOI
  20. Tyrovola K., 2006, Water Res., 40, 2375, 10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.006 · DOI
  21. Abedin M. A., 2011, Soils Found., 51, 369, 10.3208/sandf.51.369 · DOI
  22. Hug S. J., 2003, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 2734, 10.1021/es026208x · DOI
  23. Roberts L. C., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 307, 10.1021/es0343205 · DOI
  24. Li L., 2012, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 12038, 10.1021/es302456b · DOI
  25. van Genuchten C. M., 2012, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 986, 10.1021/es201913a · DOI
  26. Meng X. G., 2000, Water Res., 34, 1255, 10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00272-9 · DOI
  27. Griffioen J., 2006, J. Hydrol., 320, 359, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.047 · DOI
  28. So H. U., 2008, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 72, 5871, 10.1016/j.gca.2008.09.023 · DOI
  29. Stachowicz M., 2008, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 320, 400, 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.01.007 · DOI
  30. Mackenzie P. D., 1999, J. Hazard. Mater., 68, 1, 10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00029-1 · DOI
  31. Bitema M., 2007, J. Hazard. Mater., 149, 548, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.084 · DOI
  32. Rao P. H., 2009, Chemosphere, 75, 156, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.12.019 · DOI
  33. Su C. M., 2001, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 1487, 10.1021/es001607i · DOI
  34. Su C. M., 2001, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4562, 10.1021/es010768z · DOI
  35. Voegelin A., 2010, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 74, 164, 10.1016/j.gca.2009.09.020 · DOI
  36. Kaegi R., 2010, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 74, 5798, 10.1016/j.gca.2010.07.017 · DOI
  37. Lafferty B. J., 2010, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8467, 10.1021/es102016c · DOI
  38. He Y. T., 2009, Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 203, 359, 10.1007/s11270-009-0018-8 · DOI
  39. Su C. M., 2008, Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 193, 65, 10.1007/s11270-008-9668-1 · DOI
  40. Bouchard M. F., 2011, Environ. Health Perspect., 119, 138, 10.1289/ehp.1002321 · DOI
  41. Yoon M., 2011, Toxicol. Sci., 122, 297, 10.1093/toxsci/kfr141 · DOI
  42. Kern C. H., 2010, Synapse, 64, 363, 10.1002/syn.20736 · DOI
  43. Rasul S. B., 2002, Talanta, 58, 33, 10.1016/S0039-9140(02)00254-0 · DOI
  44. Katsoyiannis I. A., 2008, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 7424, 10.1021/es800649p · DOI · Paper page
  45. Keon N. E., 2001, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 2778, 10.1021/es001511o · DOI
  46. Poulton S. W., 2005, Chem. Geol., 214, 209, 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.09.003 · DOI
  47. Cornell, R. M.; Schwertmann, U.The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences and Uses;Wiley:Weinheim, 2003; pp297–344. · DOI
  48. Guidelines for drinking-water quality [electronic resource]: incorporating 1st and 2nd addenda, Vol. 1, Recommendations,4th ed.World Health Organization, 2011; pp307–442.
  49. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer), IARC Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to Human;National Academy Press:Washington, DC, 2001, 1980.
  50. Hernandez R., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 5157, 10.1021/es049815o · DOI
  51. Furukawa Y., 2002, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 5469, 10.1021/es025533h · DOI
  52. Kohn T., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 2867, 10.1021/es048851k · DOI
  53. Johnston R. B., 2007, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 71, 101, 10.2136/sssaj2006.0023 · DOI
  54. Wilkie J. A., 1996, Colloids Surf., A, 107, 97, 10.1016/0927-7757(95)03368-8 · DOI
  55. Dixit S., 2003, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 4182, 10.1021/es030309t · DOI
  56. Jonsson J., 2008, Chem. Geol., 255, 173, 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.06.036 · DOI
  57. Morgan J. J., 2005, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 69, 35, 10.1016/j.gca.2004.06.013 · DOI
  58. Katsoyiannis I. A., 2004, Water Res., 38, 1922, 10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.014 · DOI
  59. Katsoyiannis I. A., 2008, Desalination, 224, 330, 10.1016/j.desal.2007.06.014 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Berg M., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 5567, 10.1021/es060144z · DOI
  61. Tamura H., 2008, Corros. Sci., 50, 1872, 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.03.008 · DOI
  62. Coker V. S., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 7745, 10.1021/es060990+ · DOI
  63. Pedersen H. D., 2005, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 69, 3967, 10.1016/j.gca.2005.03.016 · DOI
  64. Pedersen H. D., 2006, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 70, 4116, 10.1016/j.gca.2006.06.1370 · DOI
  65. Yang L., 2010, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 5469, 10.1021/es1007565 · DOI
  66. Borch T., 2007, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 166, 10.1021/es060695p · DOI · Paper page
  67. Hoerle S., 2004, Corros. Sci., 46, 1431, 10.1016/j.corsci.2003.09.028 · DOI
  68. Sarin P., 2004, Water Res., 38, 1259, 10.1016/j.watres.2003.11.022 · DOI
  69. Huang Y. H., 2005, Water Res., 39, 1751, 10.1016/j.watres.2005.03.002 · DOI
  70. Hussam, A.; Munir, A. K. M.Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater;John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: 2008; pp287–303. · DOI
  71. Tobias R., 2011, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 3260, 10.1021/es102076x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neumann, A., Kaegi, R., Voegelin, A., Hussam, A., Munir, A. K. M., & Hug, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
  • Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Ueberlandstrasse 133, CH-8600 Duebendorf, Switzerland
  • George Mason University (US)
  • Sono Technology and Research Inc., Courtpara, Kushtia, Bangladesh
Corresponding author
  • Neumann, Anke
  • Hug, Stephan J.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2013-04-08
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
4544-4554
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2028657914
Cited by
189
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 4
FWCI
15.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
Keywords
arsenic removal, zero-valent iron, groundwater arsenic, drinking water treatment, iron corrosion, magnetite, manganese, sand filtration, reaeration, mass balance, Bangladesh
MeSH terms
Arsenic, Bangladesh, Filtration, Iron, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review