The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological Hydrogen Production Measured in Batch Anaerobic Respirometers
Abstract
The biological production of hydrogen from the fermentation of different substrates was examined in batch tests using heat-shocked mixed cultures with two techniques: an intermittent pressure release method (Owen method) and a continuous gas release method using a bubble measurement device (respirometric method). Under otherwise identical conditions, the respirometric method resulted in the production of 43% more hydrogen gas from glucose than the Owen method. The lower conversion of glucose to hydrogen using the Owen protocol may have been produced by repression of hydrogenase activity from high partial pressures in the gastight bottles, but this could not be proven using a thermodynamic/rate inhibition analysis. In the respirometric method, total pressure in the headspace never exceeded ambient pressure, and hydrogen typically composed as much as 62% of the headspace gas. High conversion efficiencies were consistently obtained with heat-shocked soils taken at different times and those stored for up to a month. Hydrogen gas composition was consistently in the range of 60-64% for glucose-grown cultures during logarithmic growth but declined in stationary cultures. Overall, hydrogen conversion efficiencies for glucose cultures were 23% based on the assumption of a maximum of 4 mol of hydrogen/ mol of glucose. Hydrogen conversion efficiencies were similar for sucrose (23%) and somewhat lower for molasses (15%) but were much lower for lactate (0.50%) and cellulose (0.075%).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Acetone-butanol fermentation revisited
Jones, D. T., & Woods, D. (1986) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.50.4.484-524.1986 · Cited by 1,990
Hydrogen futures: toward a sustainable energy system
Dunn, S. (2002) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/s0360-3199(01)00131-8 · Cited by 1,520
Gottschalk, G. (1986) · Springer Series in Microbiology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1072-6 · Cited by 686
Bacterial Metabolism (2nd ed.)
Werkman, C. H. (1940) · American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.30.1.98-a · Cited by 502
Hydrogen biotechnology: Progress and prospects
Benemann, J. (1996) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0996-1101 · Cited by 466
Pauss, A., Andre, G., Perrier, M., & Guiot, S. R. (1990) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.56.6.1636-1644.1990 · Cited by 305
Enzymatic production of biohydrogen
Woodward, J., Orr, M., Cordray, K., & Greenbaum, E. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35016633 · Cited by 269
Malaria susceptibility and CD36 mutation
Aitman, T. J., Cooper, L. D., Norsworthy, P. J., Wahid, F. N., Gray, J. K., Curtis, B. R., McKeigue, P. M., Kwiatkowski, D., Greenwood, B. M., Snow, R. W., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35016636 · Cited by 260
Modeling the Production of and Competition for Hydrogen in a Dechlorinating Culture
Fennell, D. E., & Gossett, J. M. (1998) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es980136l · Cited by 220
Grupe, H., & Gottschalk, G. (1992) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.58.12.3896-3902.1992 · Cited by 189
Taguchi, F., Mizukami, N., Saito‐Taki, T., & Hasegawa, K. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/m95-071 · Cited by 124
Agitation and pressure effects on acetone‐butanol fermentation
Doremus, M. G., Linden, J. C., & Moreira, A. R. (1985) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.260270615 · Cited by 117
Cited by
Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials
Kapdan, I. K., & Kargi, F. (2006) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.09.015 · Cited by 1,875
Microbial Electrolysis Cells for High Yield Hydrogen Gas Production from Organic Matter
Logan, B. E., Call, D., Cheng, S., Hamelers, H. V. M., Sleutels, T. H. J. A., Jeremiasse, A. W., & Rozendal, R. A. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es801553z · Cited by 1,368
Self-citationElectrochemically Assisted Microbial Production of Hydrogen from Acetate
Liu, H., Grot, S., & Logan, B. E. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es050244p · Cited by 1,111
Self-citationHydrogen Production in a Single Chamber Microbial Electrolysis Cell Lacking a Membrane
Call, D., & Logan, B. E. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es8001822 · Cited by 934
Self-citationHydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation
Łukajtis, R., Hołowacz, I., Kucharska, K., Glinka, M., Rybarczyk, P., Przyjazny, A., & Kamiński, M. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.043 · Cited by 698
Metadata
- Authors
- Logan, B. E., Oh, S.-E., Kim, I. S., & Van Ginkel, S.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-04-26
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2530-2535
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2011724277
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 50.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
