The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Soil Nitrogen Cycle Processes in Urban Riparian Zones
Abstract
Riparian zones have been found to function as "sinks" for nitrate (NO3-), the most common groundwater pollutant in the U. S., in many areas. The vast majority of riparian research, however, has focused on agricultural watersheds. There has been little analysis of riparian zones in urban watersheds, despite the fact that urban areas are important sources of NO3- to nitrogen (N)-sensitive coastal waters in many locations. In this study, we measured stream incision, water table depths, and pools, production (mineralization, nitrification), and consumption (denitrification) of NO3- in urban soils. Samples were taken from soil profiles (0-100 cm) of three forested urban and suburban zones and one forested reference riparian zone in the Baltimore, Maryland metropolitan area. Our objectives were to determine (1) if stream incision associated with urbanization results in lower riparian water tables, and (2) if pools, production, and consumption of NO3- vary systematically with stream incision and riparian water table levels. Two of the three urban and suburban streams were more incised and all three had lower water tables in their riparian zones than the forested reference stream. Urban and suburban riparian zones had higher NO3- pools and nitrification rates than the forested reference riparian zone, which was likely due to more aerobic soil profiles, lower levels of available soil carbon, and greater N enrichment in the urban and suburban sites. At all sites, denitrification potential decreased markedly with depth in the soil profile. Lower water tables in the urban and suburban riparian zones thus inhibit interaction of groundwater-borne NO3- with near surface soils that have the highest denitrification potential. These results suggest that urban hydrologic factors can increase the production and reduce the consumption of NO3- in riparian zones, reducing their ability to function as sinks for NO3- in the landscape.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The urban stream syndrome: Current knowledge and the search for a cure
Walsh, C. J., Roy, A. H., Feminella, J. W., Cottingham, P. D., Groffman, P. M., & Morgan, R. P. (2005) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/04-028.1 · Cited by 3,018
Self-citationPataki, D. E., Carreiro, M. M., Cherrier, J., Grulke, N. E., Jennings, V., Pincetl, S., Pouyat, R. V., Whitlow, T. H., & Zipperer, W. C. (2011) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/090220 · Cited by 860
Self-citationRestoring streams in an urbanizing world
BERNHARDT, E. S., & PALMER, M. A. (2007) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01718.x · Cited by 525
The urban watershed continuum: evolving spatial and temporal dimensions
Kaushal, S. S., & Belt, K. T. (2012) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-012-0226-7 · Cited by 435
Variation among plant species in pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems
Read, J., Wevill, T., Fletcher, T., & Deletic, A. (2008) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.036 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Groffman, P. M., Boulware, N. J., Zipperer, W. C., Pouyat, R. V., Band, L. E., & Colosimo, M. F.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-09-25
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4547-4552
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2061461067
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soil Nitrogen Cycle Processes in Urban Riparian Zones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es020649z
- The paper
- Groffman, P. M., Boulware, N. J., Zipperer, W. C., Pouyat, R. V., Band, L. E., & Colosimo, M. F. (2002). Soil Nitrogen Cycle Processes in Urban Riparian Zones. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es020649z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.