The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental Costs of Freshwater Eutrophication in England and Wales
Open accessAbstract
Eutrophication has many known consequences, but there are few data on the environmental and health costs. We developed a new framework of cost categories that assess both social and ecological damage costs and policy response costs. These findings indicate the severe effects of nutrient enrichment and eutrophication on many sectors of the economy. We estimate the damage costs of freshwater eutrophication in England and Wales to be $105-160 million yr(-1) (pound 75.0-114.3 m). The policy response costs are a measure of how much is being spent to address this damage, and these amount to $77 million yr(-1) pound 54.8 m). The damage costs are dominated by seven items each with costs of $15 million yr(-1) or more: reduced value of waterfront dwellings, drinking water treatment costs for nitrogen removal, reduced recreational and amenity value of water bodies, drinking water treatment costs for removal of algal toxins and decomposition products, reduced value of nonpolluted atmosphere, negative ecological effects on biota, and net economic losses from the tourist industry. In common with other environmental problems, it would represent net value (or cost reduction) if damage was prevented at source. A variety of effective economic, regulatory, and administrative policy instruments are available for internalizing these costs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence
Pretty, J. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2163 · Cited by 1,941
Self-citationBarton, J., & Pretty, J. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es903183r · Cited by 1,592
Self-citationEutrophication of U.S. Freshwaters: Analysis of Potential Economic Damages
Dodds, W. K., Bouska, W. W., Eitzmann, J. L., Pilger, T. J., Pitts, K. L., Riley, A. J., Schloesser, J. T., & Thornbrugh, D. J. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es801217q · Cited by 1,576
Agriculture and Eutrophication: Where Do We Go from Here?
Withers, P., Neal, C., Jarvie, H., & Doody, D. (2014) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su6095853 · Cited by 565
Farm costs and food miles: an assessment of the full cost of the UK weekly food basket
Pretty, J. N., Ball, A. S., Lang, T., & Morison, J. I. L. (2005) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.02.001 · Cited by 516
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pretty, J. N., Mason, C. F., Nedwell, D. B., Hine, R. E., Leaf, S., & Dils, R.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-11-28
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-208
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2085984205
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Costs of Freshwater Eutrophication in England and Wales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es020793k
- The paper
- Pretty, J. N., Mason, C. F., Nedwell, D. B., Hine, R. E., Leaf, S., & Dils, R. (2003). Environmental Costs of Freshwater Eutrophication in England and Wales. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es020793k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.