The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arsenic Speciation and Reactivity in Poultry Litter
Abstract
Recent U.S. government action to lower the maximum concentration levels (MCL) of total arsenic (As) (10 ppb) in drinking water has raised serious concerns about the agricultural use of As-containing biosolids such as poultry litter (PL). In this study, solid-state chemical speciation, desorbability, and total levels of As in PL and long-term amended soils were investigated using novel synchrotron-based probing techniques (microfocused (micro) synchrotron X-ray fluorescence (SXRF) and micro-X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopies) coupled with chemical digestion and batch experiments. The total As levels in the PL were as high as approximately 50 mg kg(-1), and As(II/III and V) was always concentrated in abundant needle-shaped microscopic particles (approximately 20 microm x 850 microm) associated with Ca, Cu, and Fe and to a lesser extent with S, Cl, and Zn. Post-edge XANES features of litter particles are dissimilar to those of the organo-As(V) compound in poultry feed (i.e., roxarsone), suggesting possible degradation/transformation of roxarsone in the litter and/or in poultry digestive tracts. The extent of As desorption from the litter increased with increasing time and pH from 4.5 to 7, but at most 15% of the total As was released after 5 d at pH 7, indicating the presence of insoluble phases and/or strongly retained soluble compounds. No significant As accumulation (< 15 mg kg(-1)) was found in long-term PL-amended agricultural surface soils. This suggests that As in the PL may have undergone surface and subsurface transport processes. Our research results raise concerns about long-term PL amendment effects on As contamination in surrounding soil-water environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arsenate and Chromate Retention Mechanisms on Goethite. 1. Surface Structure
Fendorf, S., Eick, M. J., Grossl, P., & Sparks, D. L. (1997) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es950653t · Cited by 1,017
Self-citationJackson, B. P., & Miller, W. P. (2000) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2000.6451616x · Cited by 217
Cited by
Genes and enzymes involved in bacterial oxidation and reduction of inorganic arsenic
Silver, S., & Phung, L. T. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.2.599-608.2005 · Cited by 612
Determination of arsenic species: A critical review of methods and applications, 2000–2003
Francesconi, K. A., & Kuehnelt, D. (2004) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/b401321m · Cited by 469
Simultaneous inner- and outer-sphere arsenate adsorption on corundum and hematite
Catalano, J. G., Park, C., Fenter, P., & Zhang, Z. (2008) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2008.02.013 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Arai, Y., Lanzirotti, A., Sutton, S., Davis, J. A., & Sparks, D. L.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-08-19
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 4083-4090
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2143064124
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arsenic Speciation and Reactivity in Poultry Litter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es0340580
- The paper
- Arai, Y., Lanzirotti, A., Sutton, S., Davis, J. A., & Sparks, D. L. (2003). Arsenic Speciation and Reactivity in Poultry Litter. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0340580
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.