The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extraction of Heavy Metals from Soils Using Biodegradable Chelating Agents
Abstract
Metal pollution of soils is widespread across the globe, and the clean up of these soils is a difficulttask. One possible remediation technique is ex-situ soil washing using chelating agents. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is a very effective chelating agent for this purpose but has the disadvantage that it is quite persistent in the environment due to its low biodegradability. The aim of our work was to investigate the biodegradable chelating agents [S,S]-ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid (EDDS), iminodisuccinic acid (IDSA), methylglycine diacetic acid (MGDA), and nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) as potential alternatives and compare them with EDTA for effectiveness. Kinetic experiments showed for all metals and soils that 24 h was the optimum extraction time. Longer times only gave minor additional benefits for heavy metal extraction but an unwanted increase in iron mobilization. For Cu at pH 7, the order of the extraction efficiency for equimolar ratios of chelating agent to metal was EDDS > NTA> IDSA > MGDA > EDTA and for Zn it was NTA > EDDS > EDTA >MGDA > IDSA. The comparatively low efficiency of EDTA resulted from competition between the heavy metals and co-extracted Ca. For Pb the order of extraction was EDTA > NTA >EDDS due to the much stronger complexation of Pb by EDTA compared to EDDS. At higher concentration of complexing agent, less difference between the agents was found and less pH dependence. There was an increase in heavy metal extraction with decreasing pH, but this was offset by an increase in Ca and Fe extraction. In sequential extractions EDDS extracted metals almost exclusively from the exchangeable, mobile, and Mn-oxide fractions. We conclude that the extraction with EDDS at pH 7 showed the best compromise between extraction efficiency for Cu, Zn, and Pb and loss of Ca and Fe from the soil.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cadmium in plants on polluted soils: Effects of soil factors, hyperaccumulation, and amendments
Kirkham, M. B. (2006) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.08.024 · Cited by 651
Is there a future for sequential chemical extraction?
Bacon, J. R., & Davidson, C. M. (2008) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/b711896a · Cited by 649
Gluhar, S., Kaurin, A., & Lestan, D. (2020) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127226 · Cited by 134
Beiyuan, J., Tsang, D. C. W., Valix, M., Baek, K., Ok, Y. S., Zhang, W., Bolan, N. S., Rinklebe, J., & Li, X.-D. (2018) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.081 · Cited by 80
Makino, T., Maejima, Y., Akahane, I., Kamiya, T., Takano, H., Fujitomi, S., Ibaraki, T., Kunhikrishnan, A., & Bolan, N. (2016) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.006 · Cited by 49
Removal of EDDS and copper from waters by TiO2 photocatalysis under simulated UV–solar conditions
Satyro, S., Marotta, R., Clarizia, L., Di Somma, I., Vitiello, G., Dezotti, M., Pinto, G., Dantas, R. F., & Andreozzi, R. (2014) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.066 · Cited by 48
Satyro, S., Race, M., Marotta, R., Dezotti, M., Spasiano, D., Mancini, G., & Fabbricino, M. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2014.08.017 · Cited by 39
Zn phytoextraction and recycling of alfalfa biomass as potential Zn-biofortified feed crop
Wang, X., Fernandes de Souza, M., Li, H., Tack, F. M. G., Ok, Y. S., & Meers, E. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143424 · Cited by 20
Assessment of amendments for the immobilization of Cu in soils containing EDDS leachates
Yang, L., Jiang, L., Wang, G., Chen, Y., Shen, Z., & Luo, C. (2015) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-015-4840-9 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Tandy, S., Bossart, K., Mueller, R., Ritschel, J., Hauser, L., Schulin, R., & Nowack, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-12-23
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 937-944
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2047255388
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.