The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methyl Arsenic Adsorption and Desorption Behavior on Iron Oxides
Abstract
In virtually all Earth surface environments, methylated forms of arsenic can be found. Because of the widespread distribution and toxicity of methyl-arsenic compounds, their adsorption by soil minerals is of considerable interest. The objective of this study was to compare the adsorption and desorption behavior of methylarsonic acid (MMAsV), methylarsonous acid (MMAsIII), dimethylarsinic acid (DMAsV), dimethylarsinous acid (DMAsIII), arsenate (iAsV), and arsenite (iAsIII) on iron oxide minerals (goethite and 2-line ferrihydrite) by means of adsorption isotherms, adsorption envelopes, and desorption envelopes (using sulfate and phosphate as desorbing ligands). MMAsIII and DMAsIII were not appreciably retained by goethite or ferrihydrite within the pH range of 3 to 11, while iAsIII was strongly adsorbed to both iron oxides. MMAsV and iAsV were adsorbed in higher amounts than DMAsV on goethite and ferrihydrite at all pH values studied. MMAsV and iAsV exhibited high adsorption affinities on both goethite and ferrihydrite from pH 3 to 10, while DMAsV was adsorbed only at pH values below 8 by ferrihydrite and below 7 by goethite. All arsenic compounds were desorbed more efficiently by phosphate than sulfate. MMAsV, iAsV, and DMAsV each exhibited adsorption characteristics suggesting specific adsorption on both goethite and ferrihydrite. Increased methyl substitution resulted in both decreased adsorbed arsenic at low arsenic concentrations in solution and increased ease of arsenic release from the iron oxide surface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arsenate and Chromate Retention Mechanisms on Goethite. 1. Surface Structure
Fendorf, S., Eick, M. J., Grossl, P., & Sparks, D. L. (1997) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es950653t · Cited by 1,017
Cited by
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 · Cited by 3,536
Khan, S., Chao, C., Waqas, M., Arp, H. P. H., & Zhu, Y.-G. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es400554x · Cited by 489
Suda, A., & Makino, T. (2016) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.017 · Cited by 357
Effect of organic matter on arsenic removal during coagulation/flocculation treatment
Pallier, V., Feuillade-Cathalifaud, G., Serpaud, B., & Bollinger, J.-C. (2010) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2009.09.068 · Cited by 154
Nanotechnology Based Solutions for Wastewater Treatment
Baruah, A., Chaudhary, V., Malik, R., & Tomer, V. K. (2019) · Nanotechnology in Water and Wastewater Treatment · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813902-8.00017-4 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Lafferty, B. J., & Loeppert, R. H.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-02-18
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2120-2127
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2061129723
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
