The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Production of Electricity from Acetate or Butyrate Using a Single-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell
Abstract
Hydrogen can be recovered by fermentation of organic material rich in carbohydrates, but much of the organic matter remains in the form of acetate and butyrate. An alternative to methane production from this organic matter is the direct generation of electricity in a microbial fuel cell (MFC). Electricity generation using a single-chambered MFC was examined using acetate or butyrate. Power generated with acetate (800 mg/L) (506 mW/m2 or 12.7 mW/ L) was up to 66% higher than that fed with butyrate (1000 mg/L) (305 mW/m2 or 7.6 mW/L), demonstrating that acetate is a preferred aqueous substrate for electricity generation in MFCs. Power output as a function of substrate concentration was well described by saturation kinetics, although maximum power densities varied with the circuit load. Maximum power densities and half-saturation constants were Pmax = 661 mW/m2 and Ks = 141 mg/L for acetate (218 ohms) and Pmax = 349 mW/m2 and Ks = 93 mg/L for butyrate (1000 ohms). Similar open circuit potentials were obtained in using acetate (798 mV) or butyrate (795 mV). Current densities measured for stable power outputwere higher for acetate (2.2 A/m2) than those measured in MFCs using butyrate (0.77 A/m2). Cyclic voltammograms suggested that the main mechanism of power production in these batch tests was by direct transfer of electrons to the electrode by bacteria growing on the electrode and not by bacteria-produced mediators. Coulombic efficiencies and overall energy recovery were 10-31 and 3-7% for acetate and 8-15 and 2-5% for butyrate, indicating substantial electron and energy losses to processes other than electricity generation. These results demonstrate that electricity generation is possible from soluble fermentation end products such as acetate and butyrate, but energy recoveries should be increased to improve the overall process performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrode-Reducing Microorganisms That Harvest Energy from Marine Sediments
Bond, D. R., Holmes, D. E., Tender, L. M., & Lovley, D. R. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066771 · Cited by 1,437
Cited by
Anodic electron transfer mechanisms in microbial fuel cells and their energy efficiency
Schröder, U. (2007) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/b703627m · Cited by 936
Hydrogen Production in a Single Chamber Microbial Electrolysis Cell Lacking a Membrane
Call, D., & Logan, B. E. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es8001822 · Cited by 934
Self-citationElectricity generation from swine wastewater using microbial fuel cells
Min, B., Kim, J., Oh, S., Regan, J. M., & Logan, B. E. (2005) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.039 · Cited by 852
Self-citationCheng, S., Liu, H., & Logan, B. E. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0512071 · Cited by 850
Self-citationA comprehensive review of microbial electrochemical systems as a platform technology
Wang, H., & Ren, Z. J. (2013) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.10.001 · Cited by 835
Principle and perspectives of hydrogen production through biocatalyzed electrolysis
ROZENDAL, R., HAMELERS, H., EUVERINK, G., METZ, S., & BUISMAN, C. (2006) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.12.006 · Cited by 732
Application of Bacterial Biocathodes in Microbial Fuel Cells
He, Z., & Angenent, L. T. (2006) · Electroanalysis · doi:10.1002/elan.200603628 · Cited by 578
Rozendal, R. A., Hamelers, H. V. M., Molenkamp, R. J., & Buisman, C. J. N. (2007) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.019 · Cited by 428
Carbon‐Based Microbial‐Fuel‐Cell Electrodes: From Conductive Supports to Active Catalysts
Li, S., Cheng, C., & Thomas, A. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201602547 · Cited by 423
Electricity Generation by Rhodopseudomonas palustris DX-1
Xing, D., Zuo, Y., Cheng, S., Regan, J. M., & Logan, B. E. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es800312v · Cited by 414
Self-citationZhang, Y., & Angelidaki, I. (2014) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.031 · Cited by 408
Increasing power generation for scaling up single-chamber air cathode microbial fuel cells
Cheng, S., & Logan, B. E. (2011) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.104 · Cited by 331
Self-citationLee, J.-Y., Lee, S.-H., & Park, H.-D. (2016) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.054 · Cited by 323
ter Heijne, A., Hamelers, H. V. M., de Wilde, V., Rozendal, R. A., & Buisman, C. J. N. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0608545 · Cited by 309
The electric picnic: synergistic requirements for exoelectrogenic microbial communities
Kiely, P. D., Regan, J. M., & Logan, B. E. (2011) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2011.03.003 · Cited by 295
Self-citationElectricity production from twelve monosaccharides using microbial fuel cells
Catal, T., Li, K., Bermek, H., & Liu, H. (2008) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.09.083 · Cited by 264
Self-citationFadhil, S. H., & Ismail, Z. Z. (2023) · Bioremediation Journal · doi:10.1080/10889868.2021.1988507 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H., Cheng, S., & Logan, B. E.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-12-03
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 658-662
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2114769310
- Cited by
- 1,023
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.