The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power Densities Using Different Cathode Catalysts (Pt and CoTMPP) and Polymer Binders (Nafion and PTFE) in Single Chamber Microbial Fuel Cells
Abstract
Cathode catalysts and binders were examined for their effect on power densities in single chamber, air-cathode, microbial fuel cells (MFCs). Chronopotentiometry tests indicated thatthe cathode potential was only slightly reduced (20-40 mV) when Pt loadings were decreased from 2 to 0.1 mg cm(-2), and that Nafion performed better as a Pt binder than poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE). Replacing the precious-metal Pt catalyst (0.5 mg cm(-2); Nafion binder) with a cobalt material (cobalt tetramethylphenylporphyrin, CoTMPP) produced slightly improved cathode performance above 0.6 mA cm(-2), but reduced performance (<40 mV) at lower current densities. MFC fed batch tests conducted for 35 cycles (31 days) using glucose showed that replacement of the Nafion binder used for the cathode catalyst (0.5 mg of Pt cm(-2)) with PTFE reduced the maximum power densities (from 400 +/- 10 to 480 +/- 20 mW m(-2) to 331 +/- 3 to 360 +/- 10 mW m(-2)). When the Pt loading on cathode was reduced to 0.1 mg cm(-2), the maximum power density of MFC was reduced on average by 19% (379 +/- 5 to 301 +/- 15 mW m(-2); Nafion binder). Power densities with CoTMPP were only 12% (369 +/- 8 mW m(-2)) lower over 25 cycles than those obtained with Pt (0.5 mg cm(-2); Nafion binder). Power densities obtained using with catalysts on the cathodes were approximately 4 times more than those obtained using a plain carbon electrode. These results demonstrate that cathodes used in MFCs can contain very little Pt, and that the Pt can even be replaced with a non-precious metal catalyst such as a CoTMPP with only slightly reduced performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lovley, D. R., & Phillips, E. J. P. (1988) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.54.6.1472-1480.1988 · Cited by 2,395
Electrode-Reducing Microorganisms That Harvest Energy from Marine Sediments
Bond, D. R., Holmes, D. E., Tender, L. M., & Lovley, D. R. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066771 · Cited by 1,437
Cited by
Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells
Logan, B. E. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2113 · Cited by 2,383
Self-citationMicrobial Electrolysis Cells for High Yield Hydrogen Gas Production from Organic Matter
Logan, B. E., Call, D., Cheng, S., Hamelers, H. V. M., Sleutels, T. H. J. A., Jeremiasse, A. W., & Rozendal, R. A. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es801553z · Cited by 1,368
Self-citationCathodic limitations in microbial fuel cells: An overview
Rismani-Yazdi, H., Carver, S. M., Christy, A. D., & Tuovinen, O. H. (2008) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.02.074 · Cited by 734
Kim, J. R., Cheng, S., Oh, S.-E., & Logan, B. E. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es062202m · Cited by 699
Self-citationCarbon‐Based Microbial‐Fuel‐Cell Electrodes: From Conductive Supports to Active Catalysts
Li, S., Cheng, C., & Thomas, A. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201602547 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, S., Liu, H., & Logan, B. E.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-11-23
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 364-369
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1999654471
- Cited by
- 850
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power Densities Using Different Cathode Catalysts (Pt and CoTMPP) and Polymer Binders (Nafion and PTFE) in Single Chamber Microbial Fuel Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es0512071
- The paper
- Cheng, S., Liu, H., & Logan, B. E. (2006). Power Densities Using Different Cathode Catalysts (Pt and CoTMPP) and Polymer Binders (Nafion and PTFE) in Single Chamber Microbial Fuel Cells. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0512071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.