Cited by 425Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactAdsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials

Characterization of Aromatic Compound Sorptive Interactions with Black Carbon (Charcoal) Assisted by Graphite as a Model

Zhu, Dongqiang, Pignatello, Joseph J.·2005·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Molecular interactions controlling the sorption of pollutants to environmental black carbons (soot, charcoal) are not well-resolved. Sorption of a series of aromatic compounds was studied to wood charcoal and nonporous graphite powder as a model adsorbent. Issues of concern were the possible involvement of pi-pi electron donor-acceptor (EDA) interactions of electron-poor and electron-rich solutes with the graphene (polycyclic aromatic) surface and size exclusion effects. Sorption of pi-acceptors, benzonitrile (BNTL), 4-nitrotoluene (MNT), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT), and 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT), and to a lesser extent pi-donor solutes, naphthalene (NAPH) and phenanthrene (PHEN), was greater than predicted by hydrophobic driving forces in accord with their acceptor or donor strength. Hydrophobic effects were estimated using a concentration-dependent free energy relationship between adsorption and partitioning into an inert solvent (n-hexadecane or benzene) for a non-donor/non-acceptor calibration set (benzene and chlorinated and methylated benzenes). Molecular complexation between acceptors and model graphene donors, NAPH, PHEN, and pyrene (PYR), in chloroform and benzene was tracked by ring-current induced upfield shifts in the 1H NMR spectrum and by charge-transfer bands in the UV/visible spectrum. The EDA component of graphite-water adsorption for the acceptors correlated with the NMR-determined complexation constant with the model donors in chloroform, which, in turn, correlated with pi-acceptor strength (TNT > DNT > MNT > BNTL) and pi-donor strength (PYR > PHEN > NAPH). Charcoal-graphite isotherms calculated from charcoal-water and graphite-water isotherms indicated molecular sieving effects on charcoal for tetrasubstituted benzenes (tetramethylbenzenes and TNT) and some trisubstituted benzenes (1,3,5-trichlorobenzene, possibly DNT). When steric effects are taken into account, the order in adsorption among acceptors was qualitatively similar for graphite and charcoal. The results suggest pi-pi EDA interactions of the acceptors-and possibly donors, although the calibration set may underestimate the hydrophobic effect for fused ring systems-with both graphite and charcoal surfaces. For graphite, it is postulated that pi-acceptors interact with electron-rich regions of the basal plane near edges and defects and that pi-donors interact with electron-depleted regions further away. A similar mechanism may operate on the charcoal but would be modified by the (mostly) electron-withdrawing effects of 0 functionality on the edges of graphene sheets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es0491376

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increasing aromaticity of TBC by phosphoric acid treatment can enhance hydrophobic interactions and π-π interactions, contributing to increased adsorption coefficient.

    “The increasing aromaticity of TBC by phosphoric acid treatment can enhance hydrophobic interactions and π -π interactions, which contributed to increase adsorption coefficient (Zhu and Pignatello 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, D., & Pignatello, J. J.
Affiliations
Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station (US)
Corresponding author
Pignatello, Joseph J.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2005-02-18
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
2033-2041
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W1984527326
Cited by
425
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 23
FWCI
10.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials
Keywords
black carbon, wood charcoal, graphite, π-π electron donor-acceptor interactions, graphene surface, nitroaromatic compounds, TNT, 2,4-dinitrotoluene, 4-nitrotoluene, benzonitrile, naphthalene, phenanthrene, pyrene, molecular complexation, charge transfer, hydrophobic effect, size exclusion, molecular sieving, adsorption isotherms, solute size effects
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Charcoal, Graphite, Hydrocarbons, Aromatic, Models, Chemical, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review