The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Electrokinetic Properties of Colloidal Fullerenes (n-C60) Formed Using Two Procedures
Abstract
In this study we report on the electrokinetic behavior of colloidal aggregates of C60fullerenes (n-C60) produced through two different techniques: solvent exchange and extended mixing with water. In the first technique, used to produce colloidal materials in several recent toxicity and transport studies, an organic solvent such as tetrahydrofuran (THF) is used to dissolve the C60 before mixing with water. The second technique is more indicative of conditions that might occur in natural aquatic systems. Both types of n-C60 were observed to be negatively charged under a variety of solution chemistries; however, the n-C60 formed using THF was more strongly charged. We conclude that n-C60 likely acquires charge through charge transfer from the organic solvent (when present) and surface hydrolysis reactions. Nevertheless, C60 is capable of acquiring charge and becoming dispersed as n-C60 in water without the aid of organic solvents, a pathway that may be important in determining the mobility of fullerenes in natural systems. These findings also show that n-C60 made using THF retains a portion of the solvent in the cluster structure, subsequently influencing the characteristics of the n-C60 and possibly requiring a re-interpretation of results from recent studies on n-C60 toxicity using THF-derived materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kroto, H. W., Allaf, A. W., & Balm, S. P. (1991) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00006a005 · Cited by 1,088
Cited by
Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects
Klaine, S. J., Alvarez, P. J. J., Batley, G. E., Fernandes, T. F., Handy, R. D., Lyon, D. Y., Mahendra, S., McLaughlin, M. J., & Lead, J. R. (2008) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1897/08-090.1 · Cited by 2,764
Nanoparticle Aggregation: Challenges to Understanding Transport and Reactivity in the Environment
Hotze, E. M., Phenrat, T., & Lowry, G. V. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2009.0462 · Cited by 1,257
Assessing the Risks of Manufactured Nanomaterials
Wiesner, M. R., Lowry, G. V., Alvarez, P., Dionysiou, D., & Biswas, P. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es062726m · Cited by 1,160
Self-citationToxicology of nanoparticles: A historical perspective
Oberdörster, G., Stone, V., & Donaldson, K. (2007) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.1080/17435390701314761 · Cited by 964
Chen, K. L., & Elimelech, M. (2007) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2007.01.074 · Cited by 657
Lyon, D. Y., Adams, L. K., Falkner, J. C., & Alvarez, P. J. J. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0603655 · Cited by 555
Bhatt, I., & Tripathi, B. N. (2011) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.10.011 · Cited by 279
Gornati, R., Longo, A., Rossi, F., Maisano, M., Sabatino, G., Mauceri, A., Bernardini, G., & Fasulo, S. (2016) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2015.1132348 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Brant, J., Lecoanet, H., Hotze, M., & Wiesner, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-05-24
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6343-6351
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2042482503
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.