Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 964

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 160 of the 160 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toxicology of nanoparticles: A historical perspective

Oberdörster, Günter, Stone, Vicki, Donaldson, Ken·2007·Nanotoxicology

Abstract

The rapid expansion of nanotechnology promises to have great benefits for society, yet there is increasing concern that human and environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials may result in significant adverse effects. That is why the field of nanotoxicology – dealing with effects and potential risks of particulate structures <100 nm in size – has emerged, growing significantly over the past decade from long-standing foundations of well established knowledge on the toxicology of fibrous and non-fibrous particles and the interactions of viruses with cells. This review places nanoparticles in the context of conventional particle toxicology and so includes references to other types of particles, such as silica and asbestos, which have been extensively studied and can provide useful lessons relevant to newly engineered nanoparticles (NP). Discoveries of nanoparticle-specific concepts of toxicology related to their small size and large specific surface area go back to the early parts of the past century, although the distinctive biological effects and kinetics of NP were not recognized until the last decade of the past century. Today, the propensity of NP to cross cell barriers, enter cells and interact with subcellular structures is well established, as is the induction of oxidative stress as a major mechanism of nanoparticle effects. In addition to the significance of small size and surface area of NP, uncovering the impact of many other physico-chemical characteristics – in particular NP surface properties – for initiating effects in the mammalian organism and the environment is now an active area of research. The article aims to cover hazards relevant to humans, provides an introduction to some of the newly emerging literature on fate and behavior of NP in the environment, as well as describing their ecotoxicology in a variety of species. Major milestones in the research leading to our present understanding of nanotoxicology and the potential risks of NP to humans and the environment are summarized. These risks are likely to be different for different nanomaterials, ranging from perceived and very low for most, to real and very high for some. There are many questions that remain to be addressed, and we foresee for the future a continuing extended research in nanotoxicology. A full understanding of the hazard of NP will make a major contribution to the risk assessment that is so urgently needed to ensure that products that utilize NP are made safely, are exploited to their full potential and then disposed of safely.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17435390701314761

Cites

160 of 160 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 160 references

Cited by

See all 964

Metadata

Authors
Oberdörster, G., Stone, V., & Donaldson, K.
Venue
Nanotoxicology
Published
2007-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
2-25
ISSN
  • 1743-5390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-5404
OpenAlex
W2012165420
Cited by
964
References
160
FWCI
35.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicology of nanoparticles: A historical perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17435390701314761
The paper
Oberdörster, G., Stone, V., & Donaldson, K. (2007). Toxicology of nanoparticles: A historical perspective. Nanotoxicology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390701314761

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.