The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chromium-Removal Processes during Groundwater Remediation by a Zerovalent Iron Permeable Reactive Barrier
Abstract
Solid-phase associations of chromium were examined in core materials collected from a full-scale, zerovalent iron permeable reactive barrier (PRB) at the U.S. Coast Guard Support Center located near Elizabeth City, NC. The PRB was installed in 1996 to treat groundwater contaminated with hexavalent chromium. After eight years of operation, the PRB remains effective at reducing concentrations of Cr from average values >1500 microg L(-1) in groundwater hydraulically upgradient of the PRB to values <1 microg L(-1) in groundwater within and hydraulically downgradient of the PRB. Chromium removal from groundwater occurs at the leading edge of the PRB and also within the aquifer immediately upgradient of the PRB. These regions also witness the greatest amount of secondary mineral formation due to steep geochemical gradients that result from the corrosion of zerovalent iron. X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy indicated that chromium is predominantly in the trivalent oxidation state, confirming that reductive processes are responsible for Cr sequestration. XANES spectra and microscopy results suggest that Cr is, in part, associated with iron sulfide grains formed as a consequence of microbially mediated sulfate reduction in and around the PRB. Results of this study provide evidence that secondary iron-bearing mineral products may enhance the capacity of zerovalent iron systems to remediate Cr in groundwater, either through redox reactions at the mineral-water interface or by the release of Fe(II) to solution via mineral dissolution and/or metal corrosion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanoscale zero valent iron and bimetallic particles for contaminated site remediation
O’Carroll, D., Sleep, B., Krol, M., Boparai, H., & Kocur, C. (2013) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.005 · Cited by 872
Prasad, S., Yadav, K. K., Kumar, S., Gupta, N., Cabral-Pinto, M. M. S., Rezania, S., Radwan, N., & Alam, J. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112174 · Cited by 744
Spectroscopic Investigation of Cr(III)- and Cr(VI)-Treated Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron
Manning, B. A., Kiser, J. R., Kwon, H., & Kanel, S. R. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es061721m · Cited by 310
Padhye, L. P., Srivastava, P., Jasemizad, T., Bolan, S., Hou, D., Shaheen, S. M., Rinklebe, J., O’Connor, D., Lamb, D., Wang, H., et al. (2023) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131575 · Cited by 198
Determination of the oxidation states of metals and metalloids: An analytical review
Vodyanitskii, Y. N. (2013) · Eurasian Soil Science · doi:10.1134/s1064229313120077 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilkin, R. T., Su, C., Ford, R. G., & Paul, C. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-04-30
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4599-4605
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2000611186
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromium-Removal Processes during Groundwater Remediation by a Zerovalent Iron Permeable Reactive Barrier. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es050157x
- The paper
- Wilkin, R. T., Su, C., Ford, R. G., & Paul, C. J. (2005). Chromium-Removal Processes during Groundwater Remediation by a Zerovalent Iron Permeable Reactive Barrier. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es050157x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.