The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Dilution on Fine Particle Mass and Partitioning of Semivolatile Organics in Diesel Exhaust and Wood Smoke
Abstract
Experiments were conducted to examine the effects of dilution on fine particle mass emissions from a diesel engine and wood stove. Filter measurements were made simultaneously using three dilution sampling systems operating at dilution ratios ranging from 20:1 to 510:1. Denuders and backup filters were used to quantify organic sampling artifacts. For the diesel engine operating at low load and wood combustion, large decreases in fine particle mass emissions were observed with increases in dilution. For example, the PM2.5 mass emission rate from a diesel engine operating at low load decreased by 50% when the dilution ratio was increased from 20:1 to 350:1. Measurements of organic and elemental carbon indicate that the changes in fine particle mass with dilution are caused by changes in partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds. At low levels of dilution semivolatile species largely occur in the particle phase, but increasing dilution reduces the concentration of semivolatile species, shifting this material to the gas phase in order to maintain phase equilibrium. Emissions of elemental carbon do not vary with dilution. Organic sampling artifacts are shown to vary with dilution because of the combination of changes in partitioning coupled with adsorption of gas-phase organics by quartz filters. The fine particle mass emissions from the diesel engine operating at medium load did not vary with dilution because of the lower emissions of semivolatile material and higher emissions of elemental carbon. To measure partitioning of semivolatile materials under atmospheric conditions, partitioning theory indicates that dilution samplers need to be operated such that the diluted exhaust achieves atmospheric levels of dilution. Too little dilution can potentially overestimate the fine particle mass emissions, and too much dilution (with clean air) can underestimate them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kittelson, D. B. (1998) · Journal of Aerosol Science · doi:10.1016/s0021-8502(97)10037-4 · Cited by 2,289
Turpin, B. J., & Lim, H.-J. (2001) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786820119445 · Cited by 2,036
Measuring and simulating particulate organics in the atmosphere: problems and prospects
Turpin, B. J., Saxena, P., & Andrews, E. (2000) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00501-4 · Cited by 982
Pankow, J. F. (1987) · Atmospheric Environment (1967) · doi:10.1016/0004-6981(87)90363-5 · Cited by 738
Subramanian, R., Khlystov, A. Y., Cabada, J. C., & Robinson, A. L. (2004) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786820390229354 · Cited by 252
Self-citationHildemann, L. M., Cass, G. R., & Markowski, G. R. (1989) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786828908959234 · Cited by 207
Hildemann, L. M., Markowski, G. R., Jones, M. C., & Cass, G. R. (1991) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786829108959478 · Cited by 188
Lipsky, E. M., Stanier, C. O., Pandis, S. Ν., et al. (2002) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef0102014 · Cited by 64
Self-citation
Cited by
The acidity of atmospheric particles and clouds
Pye, H. O. T., Nenes, A., Alexander, B., Ault, A. P., Barth, M. C., Clegg, S. L., Collett Jr., J. L., Fahey, K. M., Hennigan, C. J., Herrmann, H., et al. (2020) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020 · Cited by 785
A two-dimensional volatility basis set – Part 2: Diagnostics of organic-aerosol evolution
Donahue, N. M., Kroll, J. H., Pandis, S. N., & Robinson, A. L. (2012) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-12-615-2012 · Cited by 657
Self-citationGrieshop, A. P., Logue, J. M., Donahue, N. M., & Robinson, A. L. (2009) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-9-1263-2009 · Cited by 417
Self-citationAn overview of particulate emissions from residential biomass combustion
Vicente, E. D., & Alves, C. A. (2018) · Atmospheric Research · doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.08.027 · Cited by 339
Chemically-resolved aerosol volatility measurements from two megacity field studies
Huffman, J. A., Docherty, K. S., Aiken, A. C., Cubison, M. J., Ulbrich, I. M., DeCarlo, P. F., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., Ziemann, P. J., et al. (2009) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-9-7161-2009 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Lipsky, E. M., & Robinson, A. L.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-11-30
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 155-162
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2059984985
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.