Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Positive and Negative Artifacts in Particulate Organic Carbon Measurements with Denuded and Undenuded Sampler Configurations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program

Open access
Subramanian, R., Khlystov, Andrey Y., Cabada, Juan C., Robinson, Allen L.·2004·Aerosol Science and Technology

Abstract

Measurement of ambient particulate organic carbon (POC) with quartz filters is prone to positive and negative sampling artifacts. One approach for estimating these artifacts is to sample with a backup quartz filter placed behind either the main quartz filter or a Teflon filter in a parallel line. Another approach is to use a denuder to reduce the positive artifact in combination with a highly adsorbent backup filter to capture any negative artifact. Results obtained using both of these approaches in parallel for over one year in Pittsburgh, PA are presented in this article. A sampler using an activated carbon monolith denuder has been developed and tested extensively. Transmission losses were found to be negligible, and the denuder is on average 94% efficient at removing gas-phase organics. Denuder breakthrough is corrected for each run using a dynamic blank in parallel with the sample line. Comparisons with the dynamic blank indicate that the denuder almost eliminates the positive artifact on the quartz filter. Negative artifact from the denuded quartz filter is quantified using a carbon-impregnated glass fiber (CIG) backup filter and was found to be small, typically less than 10% of the ambient POC. Compared to the denuded sampler POC, 24 h bare quartz samples showed an almost constant positive artifact of 0.5 μg-C/m3 for samples taken throughout the year-long study period. Sampling for shorter durations (4–6 h) resulted in a larger positive artifact. A quartz filter behind a Teflon filter (QBT) provides a consistent estimate of the positive artifact on the bare quartz filter irrespective of sample duration, though it overcorrects for the positive artifact by 16–20% (attributed to particulate matter volatilizing off the upstream Teflon filter). The quartz behind quartz (QBQ) approach provides a reasonable estimate of the positive artifact on the bare quartz filter for the 24 h samples but not for the shorter samples. A slight seasonal variation is observed in the absolute value of the positive artifact, with higher values observed during the summer months.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02786820390229354

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Subramanian, R., Khlystov, A. Y., Cabada, J. C., & Robinson, A. L.
Venue
Aerosol Science and Technology
Published
2004-12
Volume
38
Issue
sup1
Pages
27-48
ISSN
  • 0278-6826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-7388
OpenAlex
W2065110306
Cited by
252
References
0
FWCI
11.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positive and Negative Artifacts in Particulate Organic Carbon Measurements with Denuded and Undenuded Sampler Configurations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02786820390229354
The paper
Subramanian, R., Khlystov, A. Y., Cabada, J. C., & Robinson, A. L. (2004). Positive and Negative Artifacts in Particulate Organic Carbon Measurements with Denuded and Undenuded Sampler Configurations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program. Aerosol Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820390229354

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.