Cited by 191Waste Management and Environmental ImpactCoal and Its By-productsAgricultural Science and Fertilization

The use of coal combustion fly ash as a soil amendment in agricultural lands (with comments on its potential to improve food security and sequester carbon)

Ukwattage, N.L., Ranjith, P.G., Bouazza, M.·2013·Fuel

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.016

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ukwattage, N. L., Ranjith, P. G., & Bouazza, M.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ranjith, P.G.
Venue
Fuel
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
109
Pages
400-408
ISSN
0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001012865
Cited by
191
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fuel (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Waste Management and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
coal combustion fly ash, soil amendment, agricultural land, food security, carbon sequestration, soil fertility, soil physical properties, soil chemical properties, soil biological properties, soil microclimate, humification, soil organic matter, coal-fired power plant waste, bottom ash, crop yield, environmental contamination, application rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review