The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adsorption Mechanism of Arsenic on Nanocrystalline Titanium Dioxide
Abstract
Arsenate [As(V)] and arsenite [As(III)] interactions at the solid-water interface of nanocrystalline TiO2 were investigated using electrophoretic mobility (EM) measurements, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy, and surface complexation modeling. The adsorption of As(V) and As(III) decreased the point of zero charge of TiO2 from 5.8 to 5.2, suggesting the formation of negatively charged inner-sphere surface complexes for both arsenic species. The EXAFS analyses indicate that both As(V) and As(III) form bidentate binuclear surface complexes as evidenced by an average Ti-As(V) bond distance of 3.30 A and Ti-As(III) bond distance of 3.35 A. The FTIR bands caused by vibrations of the adsorbed arsenic species remained at the same energy levels at different pH values. Consequently, the surface complexes on TiO2 maintained the same nonprotonated speciation at pH values from 5 to 10, and the dominant surface species were (TiO)2AsO2- and (TiO)2AsO- for As(V) and As(III), respectively. The surface configurations constrained with the spectroscopic results were formulated in the diffuse layer model to describe the adsorption behavior of As in the pH range between 4 and 12. The study suggests that TiO2 is an effective adsorbent for As removal due to its high surface area and the presence of high affinity surface hydroxyl groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 · Cited by 3,536
Aquatic arsenic: Toxicity, speciation, transformations, and remediation
Sharma, V. K., & Sohn, M. (2009) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2009.01.005 · Cited by 1,119
French, R. A., Jacobson, A. R., Kim, B., Isley, S. L., Penn, R. L., & Baveye, P. C. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es802628n · Cited by 788
Remediation of wastewater using various nano-materials
Anjum, M., Miandad, R., Waqas, M., Gehany, F., & Barakat, M. A. (2019) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.10.004 · Cited by 779
Kumar, S., Prasad, S., Yadav, K. K., Shrivastava, M., Gupta, N., Nagar, S., Bach, Q.-V., Kamyab, H., Khan, S. A., Yadav, S., et al. (2019) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.108792 · Cited by 560
RetractedSimultaneous inner- and outer-sphere arsenate adsorption on corundum and hematite
Catalano, J. G., Park, C., Fenter, P., & Zhang, Z. (2008) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2008.02.013 · Cited by 245
Removal of arsenic from water using granular ferric hydroxide: Macroscopic and microscopic studies
Guan, X.-H., Wang, J., & Chusuei, C. C. (2008) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.012 · Cited by 186
Novel, bio-based, photoactive arsenic sorbent: TiO2-impregnated chitosan bead
Miller, S. M., & Zimmerman, J. B. (2010) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.05.045 · Cited by 155
Cui, H., Su, Y., Li, Q., Gao, S., & Shang, J. K. (2013) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.040 · Cited by 108
Miller, S. M., Spaulding, M. L., & Zimmerman, J. B. (2011) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.040 · Cited by 77
Pervez, M. N., Fu, D., Wang, X., Bao, Q., Yu, T., Naddeo, V., Tian, H., Cao, C., & Zhao, Y. (2021) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2021.101437 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Pena, M., Meng, X., Korfiatis, G. P., & Jing, C.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-01-17
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1257-1262
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1973852794
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.