Cited by 126

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Partition Behavior of Fluorotelomer Alcohols and Olefins

Goss, Kai-Uwe, Bronner, Guido, Harner, Tom, Hertel, Monika, Schmidt, Torsten C.·2006·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

In this paper we present a number of equilibrium partition constants for fluorotelomer alcohols and olefins among them data for air/water and octanol/air partitioning. These data are typically required for environmental fate modeling. Our data deviate substantially from those in the literature. A comprehensive check for consistency and plausibility strongly suggests that the data published here are correct. As a consequence the fluorotelomer alcohols will sorb much more to organic phases and have a smaller tendency to remain in the water phase than expected based on previous data. The presented partition data also allow us to derive descriptors for the various kinds of specific (e.g., H-bonds) and nonspecific (e.g., van der Waals) intermolecular interactions thatthe compounds can undergo. These descriptors can be used in polyparameter linear free energy relationships (pp-LFER) in orderto predict a large variety of other partition coefficients (e.g., air/solvent, solvent/ water) as well as the temperature dependence of their air/ water partitioning. The experimental and theoretical approach that we present here can serve as a general example for what needs to be done in order to ensure high quality physicochemical data for organic pollutants.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es060004p

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Smithwick M., 2005, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 24, 986, 10.1897/04-258R.1 · DOI
  2. Stock N. L., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1699
  3. Lei Y. D., 2004, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 49, 1022
  4. Krusic P. J., 2005, J. Phys. Chem. A, 109, 6241, 10.1021/jp0502961 · DOI
  5. Goss K.-U., 2004, Environ. Sci Technol., 38, 1628
  6. Linkov I., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 6917, 6922
  7. Pontolillo J., 2001, The search for reliable aqueous solubility (Sw) and octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow) data 3577 for hydrophobic organic compounds: DDT and DDE as a case study
  8. Goss K.-U., 2001, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 9, 10.1021/es012231r · DOI
  9. Goss K.-U, 2004, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 389
  10. Nguyen T. H., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 924
  11. Goss K.-U., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 3673
  12. Niederer C., 2006, Sorption equilibrium of organic vapors in soil organic matter: Modeling of experimental data. Environ. Sci Technol
  13. Abraham M. H., 1994, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans., 2, 1791
  14. Abraham M. H., 1994, J. Pharm. Sci., 83, 1100
  15. Abraham M. H., 2005, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 18, 911, 10.1021/tx050066d · DOI
  16. Roth C. M., 2002, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 252, 30
  17. Abraham M. H., 1999, J. Chromatogr. A, 842, 114, 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00930-3 · DOI
  18. Poole C. F., 2000, Adv. Chromatogr., 40, 230
  19. Du C. M., 2000, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 38, 511
  20. Acree W. E., 2002, Fluid Phase Equilib., 201, 258, 10.1016/S0378-3812(02)00077-8 · DOI
  21. Platts J. A., 2000, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 323, 10.1021/es9906195 · DOI
  22. Weckwerth J. D., 1998, Anal. Chem., 70, 3716
  23. Poole C. F., 1989, Anal. Chim. Acta, 225, 203, 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)84607-3 · DOI
  24. Shoeib M., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1320, 10.1021/es0305555 · DOI
  25. Liu J. X., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 7540
  26. Abraham M. H., 2001, Fluid Phase Equilib., 180, 58, 10.1016/S0378-3812(00)00511-2 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Chen L., 2003, Atmos. Environ., 37, 4822
  28. Li J., 1990, J. Chromatogr., 517, 121
  29. Daubert T. E., 1997, Physical and Thermodynamic Properties of Pure Chemicals
  30. Boublik T., 1984, The vapour pressures of pure subtances
  31. Abraham M. H., 1987, Chromatographia, 23, 246, 10.1007/BF02311772 · DOI
  32. Eckert F., 2002, AlChE J., 48, 369, 10.1002/aic.690480220 · DOI
  33. McGowan J. C., 1986, Molecular Volumes In Chemistry and Biology
  34. Abraham M. H., 2004, J. Chromatogr. A, 1037, 47, 10.1016/j.chroma.2003.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Goss K.-U, 2005, Fluid Phase Equilib., 233, 22
  36. Flanagan K. B., 2005, Fluid Phase Equilib., 237, 11, 10.1016/j.fluid.2005.08.003 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goss, K.-U., Bronner, G., Harner, T., Hertel, M., & Schmidt, T. C.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2006-04-08
Volume
40
Issue
11
Pages
3572-3577
ISSN
  • 0013-936X
  • 1520-5851
Cited by
126
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review