The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Contemporary Anthropogenic Chromium Cycle
Open accessAbstract
Chromium is an essential engineering metal used in stainless and alloy steels, chemicals, and refractory products. Using material flow analysis, all major anthropogenic chromium flows are characterized for the year 2000, from mining through discard, on three spatial levels: fifty-four countries, nine world regions, and the planet. Included is the first detailed quantification of chromium in internationally traded finished products and diverse waste streams. Findings include (1) 78% of chromium flow entering final use is added as a net addition to stock on the global level; most countries are close to this figure; (2) the majority of mining occurs in Africa (2400 Gg Cr/yr) and the Commonwealth of Independent States (1090 Gg Cr/yr), while the major end-users are Asia, Europe, and North America at 1150, 1140, and 751 Gg Cr/yr, respectively; (3) waste flows of chromium are the greatest in Europe (420 Gg Cr/yr), Asia (370 Gg Cr/yr), and North America (290 Gg Cr/yr), but the composition of these waste flows varies greatly among the world regions; (4) releases of chromium by the global system, which total 2630 Gg Cr/yr, are nearly evenly divided among tailings, ferrochromium slag, downgraded scrap, and post-consumer losses; (5) many countries have a heavy foreign dependence on chromium in the all forms, as is demonstrated for the United States. The findings relating to in-use stock changes and finished product trade are relevant to industry, allowing for more accurate planning for future scrap availability. The quantification of releases due to discards and dissipation hold environmental and human health relevance, while the full life cycle international trade assessment addresses local scarcity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals
Nriagu, J. O., & Pacyna, J. M. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/333134a0 · Cited by 4,368
Cited by
Anthropogenic Nickel Cycle: Insights into Use, Trade, and Recycling
Reck, B. K., Müller, D. B., Rostkowski, K., & Graedel, T. E. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es072108l · Cited by 253
Self-citationNakajima, K., Ohno, H., Kondo, Y., Matsubae, K., Takeda, O., Miki, T., Nakamura, S., & Nagasaka, T. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es3043559 · Cited by 95
Kim, E., Spooren, J., Broos, K., Nielsen, P., Horckmans, L., Vrancken, K. C., & Quaghebeur, M. (2016) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.073 · Cited by 77
Determination of the oxidation states of metals and metalloids: An analytical review
Vodyanitskii, Y. N. (2013) · Eurasian Soil Science · doi:10.1134/s1064229313120077 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, J., Schewel, L., & Graedel, T. E.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-10-17
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 7060-7069
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W17154017
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Contemporary Anthropogenic Chromium Cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es060061i
- The paper
- Johnson, J., Schewel, L., & Graedel, T. E. (2006). The Contemporary Anthropogenic Chromium Cycle. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es060061i
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.