Cited by 95Sustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityRecycling and Waste Management Techniques

Simultaneous Material Flow Analysis of Nickel, Chromium, and Molybdenum Used in Alloy Steel by Means of Input–Output Analysis

Nakajima, Kenichi, Ohno, Hajime, Kondo, Yasushi, Matsubae, Kazuyo, Takeda, Osamu, Miki, Takahiro, Nakamura, Shinichiro, Nagasaka, Tetsuya·2013·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Steel is not elemental iron but rather a group of iron-based alloys containing many elements, especially chromium, nickel, and molybdenum. Steel recycling is expected to promote efficient resource use. However, open-loop recycling of steel could result in quality loss of nickel and molybdenum and/or material loss of chromium. Knowledge about alloying element substance flow is needed to avoid such losses. Material flow analyses (MFAs) indicate the importance of steel recycling to recovery of alloying elements. Flows of nickel, chromium, and molybdenum are interconnected, but MFAs have paid little attention to the interconnected flow of materials/substances in supply chains. This study combined a waste input-output material flow model and physical unit input-output analysis to perform a simultaneous MFA for nickel, chromium, and molybdenum in the Japanese economy in 2000. Results indicated the importance of recovery of these elements in recycling policies for end-of-life (EoL) vehicles and constructions. Improvement in EoL sorting technologies and implementation of designs for recycling/disassembly at the manufacturing phase are needed. Possible solutions include development of sorting processes for steel scrap and introduction of easier methods for identifying the composition of secondary resources. Recovery of steel scrap with a high alloy content will reduce primary inputs of alloying elements and contribute to more efficient resource use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es3043559

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakajima, K., Ohno, H., Kondo, Y., Matsubae, K., Takeda, O., Miki, T., Nakamura, S., & Nagasaka, T.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
  • Waseda University (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakajima, Kenichi
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2013-04-23
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
4653-4660
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2316386425
Cited by
95
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22360387)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Keywords
nickel, chromium, molybdenum, alloy steel, steel recycling, material flow analysis, input-output analysis, end-of-life vehicles, design for recycling, resource efficiency, Japanese economy
MeSH terms
Chromium, Molybdenum, Nickel, Steel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review