Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Source Apportionment of Molecular Markers and Organic Aerosol. 3. Food Cooking Emissions

Robinson, Allen L., Subramanian, R., Donahue, Neil M., Bernardo-Bricker, Anna, Rogge, Wolfgang F.·2006·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The chemical mass balance model is applied to a large dataset of organic molecular marker concentrations to apportion ambient organic aerosol to food cooking emissions in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Ambient concentrations of key cooking markers such as palmitoleic acid, oleic acid, and cholesterol are well correlated, which implies the existence of well-defined source profiles. However, significant inconsistencies exist between the ambient data and published source profiles. Most notably, the ambient ratio of palmitoleic-acid-to-oleic-acid is more than a factor of 10 greater than essentially all published source profiles. This problem is not unique to Pittsburgh. The reason for this discrepancy is not known but it means that both acids cannot be fit simultaneously by CMB. CMB analysis is performed using three different combinations of food cooking source profiles and molecular markers. Although all three solutions have high statistical quality, the amount of OC apportioned to food cooking emissions varies by a factor of 9. Differences in fitting species and source profile marker-to-organic-carbon ratios cause most of the large systematic biases between the different solutions. The best CMB model includes two alkanoic acids as fitting species in addition to other cooking markers, which helps constrain the source contribution estimates. It also includes two meat cooking source profiles to account for the variability in the ambient data. This model apportions 320+/-140 ng-C m(-3) or 10% of the study average ambient organic carbon to food cooking emissions. Although these results illustrate the significant challenges created by source profile variability, the strong correlations in the ambient dataset underscore the significant promise that molecular markers hold for source apportionment analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es060781p

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Robinson, A. L., Subramanian, R., Donahue, N. M., Bernardo-Bricker, A., & Rogge, W. F.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2006-11-15
Volume
40
Issue
24
Pages
7820-7827
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2003514756
Cited by
187
References
0
FWCI
8.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Source Apportionment of Molecular Markers and Organic Aerosol. 3. Food Cooking Emissions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es060781p
The paper
Robinson, A. L., Subramanian, R., Donahue, N. M., Bernardo-Bricker, A., & Rogge, W. F. (2006). Source Apportionment of Molecular Markers and Organic Aerosol. 3. Food Cooking Emissions. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es060781p

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.