The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graphite Fiber Brush Anodes for Increased Power Production in Air-Cathode Microbial Fuel Cells
Abstract
To efficiently generate electricity using bacteria in microbial fuel cells (MFCs), highly conductive noncorrosive materials are needed that have a high specific surface area (surface area per volume) and an open structure to avoid biofouling. Graphite brush anodes, consisting of graphite fibers wound around a conductive, but noncorrosive metal core, were examined for power production in cube (C-MFC) and bottle (B-MFC) air-cathode MFCs. Power production in C-MFCs containing brush electrodes at 9600 m2/m3 reactor volume reached a maximum power density of 2400 mW/m2 (normalized to the cathode projected surface area), or 73 W/m3 based on liquid volume, with a maximum Coulombic efficiency (CE) of 60%. This power density, normalized by cathode projected area, is the highest value yet achieved by an air-cathode system. The increased power resulted from a reduction in internal resistance from 31 to 8 Q. Brush electrodes (4200 m2/m3) were also tested in B-MFCs, consisting of a laboratory media bottle modified to have a single side arm with a cathode clamped to its end. B-MFCs inoculated with wastewater produced up to 1430 mW/m2 (2.3 W/m3, CE = 23%) with brush electrodes, versus 600 mW/m2 with a plain carbon paper electrode. These findings show that brush anodes that have high surface areas and a porous structure can produce high power densities, and therefore have qualities that make them ideal for scaling up MFC systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lovley, D. R., & Phillips, E. J. P. (1988) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.54.6.1472-1480.1988 · Cited by 2,395
Cited by
Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells
Logan, B. E. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2113 · Cited by 2,383
Self-citationMetal-Free Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Dai, L., Xue, Y., Qu, L., Choi, H.-J., & Baek, J.-B. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5003563 · Cited by 2,380
Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water
Logan, B. E., & Elimelech, M. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11477 · Cited by 1,644
Self-citationMicrobial Electrolysis Cells for High Yield Hydrogen Gas Production from Organic Matter
Logan, B. E., Call, D., Cheng, S., Hamelers, H. V. M., Sleutels, T. H. J. A., Jeremiasse, A. W., & Rozendal, R. A. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es801553z · Cited by 1,368
Self-citationProduction, activation, and applications of biochar in recent times
Sakhiya, A. K., Anand, A., & Kaushal, P. (2020) · Biochar · doi:10.1007/s42773-020-00047-1 · Cited by 497
Metadata
- Authors
- Logan, B., Cheng, S., Watson, V., & Estadt, G.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-03-21
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3341-3346
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2093102624
- Cited by
- 1,236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 70.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graphite Fiber Brush Anodes for Increased Power Production in Air-Cathode Microbial Fuel Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es062644y
- The paper
- Logan, B., Cheng, S., Watson, V., & Estadt, G. (2007). Graphite Fiber Brush Anodes for Increased Power Production in Air-Cathode Microbial Fuel Cells. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es062644y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.