The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Substrate-Enhanced Microbial Fuel Cells for Improved Remote Power Generation from Sediment-Based Systems
Abstract
A sediment microbial fuel cell (MFC) produces electricity through the bacterial oxidation of organic matter contained in the sediment. The power density is limited, however, due in part to the low organic matter content of most marine sediments. To increase power generation from these devices, particulate substrates were added to the anode compartment. Three materials were tested: two commercially available chitin products differing in particle size and biodegradability (Chitin 20 and Chitin 80) and cellulose powder. Maximum power densities using chitin in this substrate-enhanced sediment MFC (SEM) were 76 +/- 25 and 84 +/- 10 mW/m2 (normalized to cathode projected surface area) for Chitin 20 and Chitin 80, respectively, versus less than 2 mW/m2 for an unamended control. Power generation over a 10 day period averaged 64 +/- 27 mW/ m2 (Chitin 20) and 76 +/- 15 mW/m2 (Chitin 80). With cellulose, a similar maximum power was initially generated (83 +/- 3 mW/m2), but power rapidly decreased after only 20 h. Maximum power densities over the next 5 days varied substantially among replicate cellulose-fed reactors, ranging from 29 +/- 12 to 62 +/- 23 mW/m2. These results suggest a new approach to power generation in remote areas based on the use of particulate substrates. While the longevity of the SEM was relatively short in these studies, it is possible to increase operation times by controlling particle size, mass, and type of material needed to achieve desired power levels that could theoretically be sustained over periods of years or even decades.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lovley, D. R., & Phillips, E. J. P. (1988) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.54.6.1472-1480.1988 · Cited by 2,395
Cited by
Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells
Logan, B. E. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2113 · Cited by 2,383
Self-citationMicrobial Electrolysis Cells for High Yield Hydrogen Gas Production from Organic Matter
Logan, B. E., Call, D., Cheng, S., Hamelers, H. V. M., Sleutels, T. H. J. A., Jeremiasse, A. W., & Rozendal, R. A. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es801553z · Cited by 1,368
Self-citationBatteryless, Wireless Sensor Powered by a Sediment Microbial Fuel Cell
Donovan, C., Dewan, A., Heo, D., & Beyenal, H. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es801763g · Cited by 318
kumar, G. G., Sarathi, V. G. S., & Nahm, K. S. (2013) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2012.12.048 · Cited by 290
Electricity production from twelve monosaccharides using microbial fuel cells
Catal, T., Li, K., Bermek, H., & Liu, H. (2008) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.09.083 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Rezaei, F., Richard, T. L., Brennan, R. A., & Logan, B. E.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-05-04
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4053-4058
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2098139273
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Substrate-Enhanced Microbial Fuel Cells for Improved Remote Power Generation from Sediment-Based Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es070426e
- The paper
- Rezaei, F., Richard, T. L., Brennan, R. A., & Logan, B. E. (2007). Substrate-Enhanced Microbial Fuel Cells for Improved Remote Power Generation from Sediment-Based Systems. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es070426e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.