Hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of fine media stormwater filtration systems
Abstract
Stormwater runoff from urban areas has multiple negative hydrologic and ecological impacts for receiving waters. Fine media stormwater filtration systems have the potential to mitigate these effects, through flow attenuation and pollutant removal. This work provides an overall assessment of the hydraulic and pollutant removal behavior of sand- and soil-based stormwater filters at the laboratory scale. The influence of time, cumulative inflow sediment, cumulative water volume, wetting and drying, and compaction on hydraulic capacity was investigated. The results suggested that the primary cause of hydraulic failure was formation of a clogging layer at the filter surface. Loads of sediment and heavy metals were effectively retained; however,the soil-based filters leached nitrogen and phosphorus for the duration of the experimental period. Media pollutant profiles revealed significant accumulation of all pollutants in the top 20% of the filter profile, suggesting that elevated discharges of nutrients was due to leaching of native material, rather than failure to remove incoming pollutants. It is recommended that the top 2-5 cm of the filter surface be scraped off every two years to prevent hydraulic failure; this will also avoid excessive accumulation of heavy metals, which may otherwise have been of concern.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A large number of field and laboratory studies have shown efficient total metal removal for bioretention systems, often exceeding 80-90%.
“A large number of field and laboratory studies have shown efficient total metal removal for bioretention systems, often exceeding 80–90% (e.g. Hatt et al., 2008; Søberg et al., 2017).”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Hatt et al., 2008
The bioretention systems examined in the cited studies were relatively young (<2 years) and found metals to be adsorbed in the top 5 cm of the filter material, so these systems were far from saturated with metals.
“Moreover, the bioretention systems examined in the cited studies (Muthanna et al., 2007; Hatt et al., 2008; Blecken et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2017; Søberg et al., 2017) were relatively young (<2 years) and found metals to be adsorbed in the top 5 cm of the filter material. Hence, these systems were far from saturated with metals.”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Hatt et al., 2008
Cites
Genç-Fuhrman, H., Mikkelsen, P. S., & Ledin, A. (2007) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.10.024 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Plenty of room for carbon on the ground: Potential applications of biochar for stormwater treatment
Mohanty, S. K., Valenca, R., Berger, A. W., Yu, I. K. M., Xiong, X., Saunders, T. M., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.037 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Urban Stormwater Treatment Using Bioretention
Trowsdale, S. A., & Simcock, R. (2011) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.023 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Hamel, P., & Tan, L. (2022) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-021-01467-w · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Tian, J., Jin, J., Chiu, P. C., Cha, D. K., Guo, M., & Imhoff, P. T. (2019) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.030 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Al-Ameri, M., Hatt, B., Le Coustumer, S., Fletcher, T., Payne, E., & Deletic, A. (2018) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.027 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationSpatial accumulation and strength of affiliation of heavy metals in bioretention media
Jones, P. S., & Davis, A. P. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000624 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Søberg, L. C., Winston, R., Viklander, M., & Blecken, G.-T. (2019) · Water Research X · doi:10.1016/j.wroa.2019.100032 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“, 2017), while others have found substantial leaching (e.g. Muthanna et al., 2007; Hatt et al., 2008; Søberg et al., 2017).”
BackgroundTeixidó, M., Charbonnet, J. A., LeFevre, G. H., Luthy, R. G., & Sedlak, D. L. (2022) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2022.119246 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hatt, B. E., Fletcher, T. D., & Deletic, A.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Facility for Advancing Water Biofiltration, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, 3800 Victoria, Australia
- Corresponding author
- Hatt, Belinda E.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-02-21
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2535-2541
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2040766487
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 11.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- stormwater filtration, sand filter, hydraulic capacity, filter clogging, sediment trapping, heavy metal removal, nitrogen leaching, phosphorus leaching, wetting-drying cycles, urban stormwater runoff
- MeSH terms
- Equipment Design, Filtration, Water Pollutants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review