Cited by 95Environmental Impact and SustainabilityRecycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceSustainable Building Design and Assessment

Assessing the End-of-Life Impacts of Buildings

Open access
Vieira, Pedro Santos, Horvath, Arpad·2008·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

This paper builds on previous research on end of life of products by synthesizing some of the theories proposed in the literature and presenting a method for environmental decision-making related to buildings. This is achieved through different solutions, but most significantly through the use of hybrid life-cycle assessment and the definition of allocation boundaries in a way that decreases the uncertainty associated with technologicalforecasting. Results show that there is no significant difference between the results of two major end-of-life assessment approaches (attributional and consequential), and that the choice between the use of one or the other for buildings may not be a critical decision. Assessing the impacts of recycling polices requires accounting for product substitutions, market analysis, and the full supply chain impacts of the recycling chains. Increasing the recycling of concrete from deconstructed buildings from the current 27% rate to 50% could yield a 2-3% (2.7-5.6 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents) reduction in buildings' greenhouse gas emissions, or the equivalent of removing 408,000-847,000 typical cars from U.S. roads.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es071345l

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Sandler, K. Analyzing What's Recyclable in C&D Debris. BioCycle 2003, 44 (11), 51.
  2. Ekvall, T.; Finnveden, G. Allocation in ISO 14041sA Critical Review. J. Cleaner Prod. 2001, 9, 197-208.
  3. Curran, M.; Mann, M.; Norris, G. Report on the International Workshop on Electricity Data for Life Cycle Inventories; Report EPA/600/R-02/041;
  4. Sachs, N. Planning the Funeral at the Birth: Extended Producer Responsibility in the European Union and the United States. Harvard Environ. Law Rev. 2006, 30 (1), 51-98.
  5. Ekvall, T.; Andræ, A. Attributional and Consequential Environ- mental Assessment of the Shift to Lead-Free Solders. Int. J. LCA 2006, 11 (5), 344-353.
  6. Guggemos, A. Environmental Impacts of On-site Construction Processes: Focus on Structural Frames. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineer- ing, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vieira, P. S., & Horvath, A.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Horvath, Arpad
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2008-05-21
Volume
42
Issue
13
Pages
4663-4669
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2081976533
Cited by
95
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0094022)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Keywords
building end-of-life, hybrid life cycle assessment, recycling policy, concrete recycling, greenhouse gas emissions, product substitution, supply chain impacts, environmental decision-making
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Construction Materials, Environment, Models, Theoretical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review