The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tracking Antibiotic Resistance Genes in the South Platte River Basin Using Molecular Signatures of Urban, Agricultural, And Pristine Sources
Abstract
A novel approach utilizing antibiotic-resistance-gene (ARG) molecular signatures was applied to track the sources of ARGs at sites along the Cache la Poudre (Poudre) and South Platte Rivers in Colorado. Two lines of evidence were employed: (1) detection frequencies of 2 sulfonamide and 11 tetracycline ARGs and (2) tet(W) phylotype and phylogenetic analysis. A GIS database indicating the locations of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and animal feeding operations (AFOs) in the watershed was also constructed to assess congruence of the surrounding landscape with the putative sources identified by ARG molecular signatures. Discriminant analysis was performed on detection frequencies of tetARG groups that were previously identified to be associated with either WWTPs or AFOs. All but one (South Platte River-3, just downstream from the confluence with the Poudre River) of the eight sites were classified as primarily WWTP-influenced based on discriminant analysis of ARG detection frequencies. tet(W) phylotype analysis also aligned South Platte River-3 with putative AFO sources, while phylogenetic analysis indicated that it was not significantly different from the AFOs or WWTPs investigated. South Platte River-3 is situated in an intense agricultural area, but the upstream portion of the South Platte River receives substantial loading from metropolitan Denver. By contrast, tet(W) phylotype and phylogenetics of site Poudre River-4, located 4 km downstream of a WWTP, was also characterized and found to be significantly different from the AFO lagoons (p < 0.05), as expected. In general, a good correspondence was found between classification of the impacted river sites and the surrounding landscape. While the overall approach could be extended to other watersheds, the general findings indicate that transport of ARGs from specific sources is likely the dominant mechanism for ARG proliferation in this riverine environment relative to selection of ARGs among native bacteria by antibiotics and other pollutants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antibiotic resistance gene spread due to manure application on agricultural fields
Heuer, H., Schmitt, H., & Smalla, K. (2011) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2011.04.009 · Cited by 985
McKinney, C. W., & Pruden, A. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es303652q · Cited by 532
Self-citationUnderstanding the contribution of environmental factors in the spread of antimicrobial resistance
Fletcher, S. (2015) · Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12199-015-0468-0 · Cited by 317
Stormwater loadings of antibiotic resistance genes in an urban stream
Garner, E., Benitez, R., von Wagoner, E., Sawyer, R., Schaberg, E., Hession, W. C., Krometis, L.-A. H., Badgley, B. D., & Pruden, A. (2017) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.046 · Cited by 131
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Storteboom, H., Arabi, M., Davis, J. G., Crimi, B., & Pruden, A.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-09-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7397-7404
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2076688480
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tracking Antibiotic Resistance Genes in the South Platte River Basin Using Molecular Signatures of Urban, Agricultural, And Pristine Sources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es101657s
- The paper
- Storteboom, H., Arabi, M., Davis, J. G., Crimi, B., & Pruden, A. (2010). Tracking Antibiotic Resistance Genes in the South Platte River Basin Using Molecular Signatures of Urban, Agricultural, And Pristine Sources. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101657s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.