The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Removing Arsenic from Synthetic Groundwater with Iron Electrocoagulation: An Fe and As K-Edge EXAFS Study
Abstract
Electrocoagulation (EC) using iron electrodes is a promising arsenic removal strategy for Bangladesh groundwater drinking supplies. EC is based on the rapid in situ dissolution of a sacrificial Fe(0) anode to generate iron precipitates with a high arsenic sorption affinity. We used X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) to investigate the local coordination environment (<4.0 Å) of Fe and As in EC precipitates generated in synthetic Bangladesh groundwater (SBGW). Fe and As K-edge EXAFS spectra were found to be similar between samples regardless of the large range of current density (0.02, 1.1, 5.0, 100 mA/cm(2)) used to generate samples. Shell-by-shell fits of the Fe K-edge EXAFS spectra indicated that EC precipitates consist of primarily edge-sharing FeO(6) octahedra. The absence of corner-sharing FeO(6) octahedra implies that EC precipitates resemble nanoscale clusters (polymers) of edge-sharing octahedra that efficiently bind arsenic. Shell-by-shell fits of As K-edge EXAFS spectra show that arsenic, initially present as a mixture of As(III) and As(V), forms primarily binuclear, corner-sharing As(V) surface complexes on EC precipitates. This specific coordination geometry prevents the formation of FeO(6) corner-sharing linkages. Phosphate and silicate, abundant in SBGW, likely influence the structure of EC precipitates in a similar way by preventing FeO(6) corner-sharing linkages. This study provides a better understanding of the structure, reactivity, and colloidal stability of EC precipitates and the behavior of arsenic during EC. The results also offer useful constraints for predicting arsenic remobilization during the long-term disposal of EC sludge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Soils and Minerals Using X‐ray Absorption Spectroscopy
Kelly, S. D., Hesterberg, D., & Ravel, B. (2008) · SSSA Book Series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.5.c14 · Cited by 400
Doelsch, E., Rose, J., Masion, A., Bottero, J. Y., Nahon, D., & Bertsch, P. M. (2000) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la991378h · Cited by 101
Cited by
Liu, C.-H., Chuang, Y.-H., Chen, T.-Y., Tian, Y., Li, H., Wang, M.-K., & Zhang, W. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00381 · Cited by 398
Arsenic Removal with Composite Iron Matrix Filters in Bangladesh: A Field and Laboratory Study
Neumann, A., Kaegi, R., Voegelin, A., Hussam, A., Munir, A. K. M., & Hug, S. J. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es305176x · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- van Genuchten, C. M., Addy, S. E. A., Peña, J., & Gadgil, A. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-01-06
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 986-994
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2331482145
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Removing Arsenic from Synthetic Groundwater with Iron Electrocoagulation: An Fe and As K-Edge EXAFS Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es201913a
- The paper
- van Genuchten, C. M., Addy, S. E. A., Peña, J., & Gadgil, A. J. (2012). Removing Arsenic from Synthetic Groundwater with Iron Electrocoagulation: An Fe and As K-Edge EXAFS Study. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201913a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.