The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Critical Review of Low-Density Polyethylene’s Partitioning and Diffusion Coefficients for Trace Organic Contaminants and Implications for Its Use As a Passive Sampler
Open accessAbstract
Polyethylene (PE)-water equilibrium partitioning constants, K(PEw), were reviewed for trace hydrophobic organic contaminants (HOCs). Relative standard deviations were <30% for phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, and pyrene implying excellent reproducibility of K(PEw) across laboratories and PE sources. Averaged K(PEw) values of various HOCs were best correlated with aqueous solubility, logC(w)(sat)(L): logK(PEw) = -0.99(±0.029)logC(w)(sat)(L) + 2.39(±0.096) (r(2) = 0.92, SE = 0.35, n = 100). For 80% of analytes, this equation predicted logK(PEw) within a factor of 2. A first-order estimation of K(PEw) can be obtained assuming constant solubility of the compounds in the PE, such that the variation in C(w)(sat)(L) determines the differences in K(PEw). For PE samplers, K(PEw) values do not change with the thickness of the PE sampler. The influence of temperature on K(PEw) seems dominated by solubility-changes of the compound in water, not in PE. The effect of salt is rather well understood, using a Schetschenow-style approach. The air-PE partitioning constant, K(PEa), can be approximated as the ratio of K(PEw)/K(aw) (the air-water partitioning constant). A critical review of diffusivities in PE, D(PE), suggests that best results are obtained when using the film-stacking method. A good correlation is then found between D(PE) and molar volume, V(m) (Ǻ(3)/mol): logD(PE) (m(2)/s) = 0.0145(±0.001)V(m) + 10.1(±0.20) (r(2) = 0.76, SE = 0.24, n = 74).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rummel, C. D., Jahnke, A., Gorokhova, E., Kühnel, D., & Schmitt-Jansen, M. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00164 · Cited by 1,444
Plastics in the Marine Environment
Law, K. L. (2017) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060409 · Cited by 1,059
Strong Sorption of PCBs to Nanoplastics, Microplastics, Carbon Nanotubes, and Fullerenes
Velzeboer, I., Kwadijk, C. J. A. F., & Koelmans, A. A. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es405721v · Cited by 939
The behaviors of microplastics in the marine environment
Wang, J., Tan, Z., Peng, J., Qiu, Q., & Li, M. (2016) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.10.014 · Cited by 836
Quantifying the Total and Bioavailable Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Dioxins in Biochars
Hale, S. E., Lehmann, J., Rutherford, D., Zimmerman, A. R., Bachmann, R. T., Shitumbanuma, V., O’Toole, A., Sundqvist, K. L., Arp, H. P. H., & Cornelissen, G. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es203984k · Cited by 634
Metadata
- Authors
- Lohmann, R.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-12-19
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 606-618
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2316379093
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Review of Low-Density Polyethylene’s Partitioning and Diffusion Coefficients for Trace Organic Contaminants and Implications for Its Use As a Passive Sampler. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es202702y
- The paper
- Lohmann, R. (2012). Critical Review of Low-Density Polyethylene’s Partitioning and Diffusion Coefficients for Trace Organic Contaminants and Implications for Its Use As a Passive Sampler. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es202702y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.